ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2012
The importance of clinical trial data sharing: toward more open science.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine-learning versus traditional approaches for atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk prognostication in primary prevention cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2023Pooled it
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018Guideline
- A patient-level data meta-analysis of standard-of-care treatments from eight prostate cancer clinical trials.Scientific data · 2016Pooled it
- Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015Pooled it
- Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA).BMC medicine · 2015Guideline
- Barriers and enablers for publishing results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional survey of principal investigators in sub-Saharan Africa.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Article
- Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Publication of data sharing statements in clinical trials by cardiovascular journals: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Reducing risk of bias in interventional studies during their design and conduct: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Open science practices in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: A path to enhanced transparency and collaboration.Integrative medicine research · 2024Article
- Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Article
- Bridging the gap: a translational perspective in spinal cord injury.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Artificial general intelligence for radiation oncology.Meta-radiology · 2023Article
- Clinical trial data sharing: a cross-sectional study of outcomes associated with two U.S. National Institutes of Health models.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2023Article
- What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders' perspectives.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- How do we measure the costs, benefits, and harms of sharing data from biomedical studies? A protocol for a scoping review.Open research Europe · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.