ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2012
Strengthening and opening up health research by sharing our raw data.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015Pooled it
- Concordance between clinical trial data use request proposals and corresponding publications: A cross-sectional study.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2021Review
- Is Sharing Datasets the Answer to the New Challenges of Reproductive Biology Research?Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Does open data boost journal impact: evidence from Chinese economics.Scientometrics · 2021Article
- UK publicly funded Clinical Trials Units supported a controlled access approach to share individual participant data but highlighted concerns.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2016Article
- Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015Article
- Sea change in open science and data sharing: leadership by industry.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2014Article
- Spatially explicit data: stewardship and ethical challenges in science.PLoS biology · 2013Article
- Sharing individual level data from observational studies and clinical trials: a perspective from NHLBI.Trials · 2013Article
- A historic moment for open science: the Yale University Open Data Access project and medtronic.Annals of internal medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22438464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.