ArticleHormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme2012
Genetic screening for von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations in non-syndromic pheochromocytoma: low prevalence and false-positives or misdiagnosis indicate a need for caution.
Article in Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- When should genetic testing be performed in patients with neuroendocrine tumours?Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2017Review
- Metabologenomics of Phaeochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: An Integrated Approach for Personalised Biochemical and Genetic Testing.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2017Review
- Next-generation sequencing in the clinical genetic screening of patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.Endocrine connections · 2013Article
- Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: progress on all fronts.Endocrine pathology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing of tumor susceptibility genes is now recommended in most patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (PPGL), even in the absence of a syndromic presentation. Once a mutation is diagnosed there is rarely follow-up validation to assess the possibility of misdiagnosis. This study prospectively examined the prevalence of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene mutations among 182 patients with non-syndromic PPGLs. Follow-up in positive cases included comparisons of biochemical and tumor gene expression data in 64 established VHL patients, with confirmatory genetic testing in cases with an atypical presentation. VHL mutations were detected by certified laboratory testing in 3 of the 182 patients with non-syndromic PPGLs. Two of the 3 had an unusual presentation of diffuse peritoneal metastases and substantial increases in plasma metanephrine, the metabolite of epinephrine. Tumor gene expression profiles in these 2 patients also differed markedly from those associated with established VHL syndrome. One patient was diagnosed with a partial deletion by Southern blot analysis and the other with a splice site mutation. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and comparative genomic hybridization failed to confirm the partial deletion indicated by certified laboratory testing. Analysis of tumor DNA in the other patient with a splice site alteration indicated no loss of heterozygosity or second hit point mutation. In conclusion, VHL germline mutations represent a minor cause of non-syndromic PPGLs and misdiagnoses can occur. Caution should therefore be exercised in interpreting positive genetic test results as the cause of disease in patients with non-syndromic PPGLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.