Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22438129›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2012

Bayesian semiparametric regression models for evaluating pathway effects on continuous and binary clinical outcomes.

Inyoung Kim, Herbert Pang, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inyoung KimDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A. inyoungk@vt.edu
Herbert Pang
Hongyu Zhao

Funding

Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Eric P. Winer · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Ferrante · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Yale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Research CenterP30DA018343 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANGUS C. NAIRN, Kenneth Robert WILLIAMS · 2004 to 2026
$37.1M
STATISTICAL METHODS TO MAP GENES FOR COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM059507 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 1999 to 2013
$3.6M
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28186N01HV028186 · HV · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, KENNETH · 2002 to 2006
–
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028186NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-28186NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018343NIDA NIH HHS P30-DA-18343NIGMS NIH HHS GM-59507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many statistical methods for microarray data analysis consider one gene at a time, and they may miss subtle changes at the single gene level. This limitation may be overcome by considering a set of genes simultaneously where the gene sets are derived from prior biological knowledge. Limited work has been carried out in the regression setting to study the effects of clinical covariates and expression levels of genes in a pathway either on a continuous or on a binary clinical outcome. Hence, we propose a Bayesian approach for identifying pathways related to both types of outcomes. We compare our Bayesian approaches with a likelihood-based approach that was developed by relating a least squares kernel machine for nonparametric pathway effect with a restricted maximum likelihood for variance components. Unlike the likelihood-based approach, the Bayesian approach allows us to directly estimate all parameters and pathway effects. It can incorporate prior knowledge into Bayesian hierarchical model formulation and makes inference by using the posterior samples without asymptotic theory. We consider several kernels (Gaussian, polynomial, and neural network kernels) to characterize gene expression effects in a pathway on clinical outcomes. Our simulation results suggest that the Bayesian approach has more accurate coverage probability than the likelihood-based approach, and this is especially so when the sample size is small compared with the number of genes being studied in a pathway. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approaches through its applications to a type II diabetes mellitus data set. Our approaches can also be applied to other settings where a large number of strongly correlated predictors are present.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMicroarray AnalysisNormal DistributionOutcome Assessment, Health CareRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22438129
PMCPMC3763871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.