Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22437073›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Automated extraction of ejection fraction for quality measurement using regular expressions in Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) for heart failure.

Jennifer H Garvin, Scott L DuVall, Brett R South, Bruce E Bray, Daniel Bolton, Julia Heavirland, Steve Pickard, Paul Heidenreich, Shuying Shen, Charlene Weir and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cohort selection for clinical trials using hierarchical neural network.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer H GarvinIDEAS Center, SLC VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah 84148, USA. jennifer.garvin@va.gov
Scott L DuVall
Brett R South
Bruce E Bray
Daniel Bolton
Julia Heavirland
Steve Pickard
Paul Heidenreich
Shuying Shen
Charlene Weir
Matthew Samore
Mary K Goldstein
University of Utah · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLeft ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a key component of heart failure quality measures used within the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). Our goals were to build a natural language processing system to extract the EF from free-text echocardiogram reports to automate measurement reporting and to validate the accuracy of the system using a comparison reference standard developed through human review. This project was a Translational Use Case Project within the VA Consortium for Healthcare Informatics. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe created a set of regular expressions and rules to capture the EF using a random sample of 765 echocardiograms from seven VA medical centers. The documents were randomly assigned to two sets: a set of 275 used for training and a second set of 490 used for testing and validation. To establish the reference standard, two independent reviewers annotated all documents in both sets; a third reviewer adjudicated disagreements.

resultsSystem test results for document-level classification of EF of <40% had a sensitivity (recall) of 98.41%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value (precision) of 100%, and an F measure of 99.2%. System test results at the concept level had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI 87.7% to 90.0%), a positive predictive value of 95% (95% CI 94.2% to 95.9%), and an F measure of 91.9% (95% CI 91.2% to 92.7%). DISCUSSION: An EF value of <40% can be accurately identified in VA echocardiogram reports.

conclusionsAn automated information extraction system can be used to accurately extract EF for quality measurement.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedNatural Language ProcessingQuality Indicators, Health CareStroke VolumeData MiningEchocardiographyHumansReference StandardsSoftware ValidationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID22437073
PMCPMC3422820
OpenAlexW2120992942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.