ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2012
Regenerative pulmonary medicine: potential and promise, pitfalls and challenges.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between endothelial progenitor cells and pulmonary arterial hypertension in children with congenital heart disease.BMC pediatrics · 2019Article
- Stem cell therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. How far is it to the clinic?American journal of stem cells · 2018Review
- Therapeutic potential of adipose stem cell-derived conditioned medium against pulmonary hypertension and lung fibrosis.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Aging and Lung Disease. Clinical Impact and Cellular and Molecular Pathways.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2015Review
- Article
- Stem and progenitor cell therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: effects on the right ventricle (2013 Grover Conference Series).Pulmonary circulation · 2015Review
- Cell-based therapy in lung regenerative medicine.Regenerative medicine research · 2014Review
- Bone marrow-derived multipotent stromal cells attenuate inflammation in obliterative airway disease in mouse tracheal allografts.Stem cells international · 2014Article
- Comparative study of immune regulatory properties of stem cells derived from different tissues.Stem cells and development · 2013Article
- Stem cells, cell therapies, and bioengineering in lung biology and diseases. Comprehensive review of the recent literature 2010-2012.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2013Review
- Experimental basis and new insights for cell therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2012Review
- MicroRNAs and mesenchymal stem cells: hope for pulmonary hypertension.Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia CardiovascularReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic lung diseases contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of the population. There are few effective treatments for many chronic lung diseases, and even fewer therapies that can arrest or reverse the progress of the disease.
designIn this review, we present the current state of regenerative therapies for the treatment of chronic lung diseases. We focus on endothelial progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and endogenous lung stem/progenitor cells; summarize the work to date in models of lung diseases for each of these therapies; and consider their potential benefits and risks as viable therapies for patients with lung diseases.
conclusionsCell-based regenerative therapies for lung diseases offer great promise, with preclinical studies suggesting that the next decade should provide the evidence necessary for their ultimate application to our therapeutic armamentarium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.