ReviewDrug safety2012
Safety of flecainide.
Review in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2014Guideline
- Flecainide in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis as a Neuroprotective Strategy (FANS): A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.EBioMedicine · 2015Trial
- Toxidromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Suicide by flecainide: a case report and review of the literature.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Successful Management of Fetal Supraventricular Tachycardia With Flecainide in a Case Complicated by Early Hydrops Fetalis: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Special Issue "Ion Conductance and Ion Regulation in Human Health and Disease".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Flecainide Toxicity Leading to Transient Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Case Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Flecainide Specifically Targets the Monovalent Countercurrent Through the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor, While a Dominant Opposing CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Flecainide toxicity-Clinical diagnosis and management of an urgent condition.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- [Antiarrhythmic drugs in the present day].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Gut microbiota and cardiac arrhythmia: a pharmacokinetic scope.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2022Review
- Increased atrial effectiveness of flecainide conferred by altered biophysical properties of sodium channels.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2022Article
- Flecainide in Ventricular Arrhythmias: From Old Myths to New Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Flecainide-induced myalgias and weakness: a rare adverse reaction.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Selective late sodium current inhibitor GS-458967 suppresses Torsades de Pointes by mostly affecting perpetuation but not initiation of the arrhythmia.British journal of pharmacology · 2018Article
- Flecainide and elevated liver enzymes in α1-antitrypsin deficiency.HeartRhythm case reports · 2016Article
- Intermittent failure to capture: What is the mechanism?HeartRhythm case reports · 2016Article
- Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flecainide is a class Ic antiarrhythmic agent that has an important role as part of rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Early clinical data on the use of flecainide showed an increase in arrhythmias and mortality compared with placebo in patients with a previous myocardial infarction and asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. These findings only apply to a specific group of patients with left ventricular dysfunction and ischaemic heart disease, but had a negative impact on the use of class Ic antiarrhythmics across all indications and patient groups. The aim of this review was to evaluate the available safety data for flecainide in the literature and to assess its current use in patients with AF. Current European guidelines now recommend the use of flecainide in carefully selected groups of patients with AF who do not have structural heart disease. This includes for the cardioversion of recent-onset AF, pretreatment prior to direct current cardioversion, out-of-hospital acute oral therapy ('pill-in-the-pocket' approach) and for the ongoing maintenance of sinus rhythm. Potential cardiac adverse effects of flecainide include proarrhythmia, conduction abnormalities and negative inotropic effects. Dizziness is the most frequent non-cardiac side effect, followed by blurred vision and difficulty focusing; these are almost all mild, transient and tolerable. Data from recent clinical trials in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias suggest that flecainide has a good tolerability profile in groups of appropriately selected patients. Caution is required when using flecainide in patients with renal dysfunction, and there are a number of drug interactions, but these are well documented and manageable. Overall, flecainide is a good choice for the pharmacological management of AF. It has a good safety record and low incidence of adverse effects, rare end-organ toxicity and a low risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. To ensure that the benefits of treatment outweigh any potential risks, careful patient selection and monitoring is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.