Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22434846›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012

The importance of identifying alternative splicing in vertebrate genome annotation.

Adam Frankish, Jonathan M Mudge, Mark Thomas, Jennifer Harrow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. BRCA1-No Matter How You Splice It.Cancer research · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. APPRIS WebServer and WebServices.Nucleic acids research · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent advances in biocuration: meeting report from the Fifth International Biocuration Conference.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam FrankishHuman and Vertebrate Analysis and Annotation Team, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. af2@sanger.ac.uk
Jonathan M Mudge
Mark Thomas
Jennifer Harrow

Funding

Integrated human genome annotation: generation of a reference gene setU54HG004555 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI HUBBARD, TIMOTHY JOHN · 2007 to 2012
$11.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS 5U54HG004555-04S1NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004555Wellcome Trust WT077198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While alternative splicing (AS) can potentially expand the functional repertoire of vertebrate genomes, relatively few AS transcripts have been experimentally characterized. We describe our detailed manual annotation of vertebrate genomes, which is generating a publicly available geneset rich in AS. In order to achieve this we have adopted a highly sensitive approach to annotating gene models supported by correctly mapped, canonically spliced transcriptional evidence combined with a highly cautious approach to adding unsupported extensions to models and making decisions on their functional potential. We use information about the predicted functional potential and structural properties of every AS transcript annotated at a protein-coding or non-coding locus to place them into one of eleven subclasses. We describe the incorporation of new sequencing and proteomics technologies into our annotation pipelines, which are used to identify and validate AS. Combining all data sources has led to the production of a rich geneset containing an average of 6.3 AS transcripts for every human multi-exon protein-coding gene. The datasets produced have proved very useful in providing context to studies investigating the functional potential of genes and the effect of variation may have on gene structure and function. DATABASE URL: http://www.ensembl.org/index.html, http://vega.sanger.ac.uk/index.html.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenomeAlternative SplicingAnimalsHumansMiceModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence AnnotationVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID22434846
PMCPMC3308168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.