ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012
A hybrid human and machine resource curation pipeline for the Neuroscience Information Framework.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pennsieve: A Collaborative Platform for Translational Neuroscience and Beyond.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Global chromatin relabeling accompanies spatial inversion of chromatin in rod photoreceptors.Science advances · 2021Article
- An open-source framework for neuroscience metadata management applied to digital reconstructions of neuronal morphology.Brain informatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Scaling up data curation using deep learning: An application to literature triage in genomic variation resources.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- DataMed - an open source discovery index for finding biomedical datasets.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Resource Disambiguator for the Web: Extracting Biomedical Resources and Their Citations from the Scientific Literature.PloS one · 2016Article
- Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Leveraging biomedical informatics for assessing plasticity and repair in primate spinal cord injury.Brain research · 2015Review
- Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- Extending the NIF DISCO framework to automate complex workflow: coordinating the harvest and integration of data from diverse neuroscience information resources.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2014Article
- On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature.PeerJ · 2013Article
- MOBBED: a computational data infrastructure for handling large collections of event-rich time series datasets in MATLAB.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2013Article
- Biological databases for behavioral neurobiology.International review of neurobiology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The breadth of information resources available to researchers on the Internet continues to expand, particularly in light of recently implemented data-sharing policies required by funding agencies. However, the nature of dense, multifaceted neuroscience data and the design of contemporary search engine systems makes efficient, reliable and relevant discovery of such information a significant challenge. This challenge is specifically pertinent for online databases, whose dynamic content is 'hidden' from search engines. The Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF; http://www.neuinfo.org) was funded by the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research to address the problem of finding and utilizing neuroscience-relevant resources such as software tools, data sets, experimental animals and antibodies across the Internet. From the outset, NIF sought to provide an accounting of available resources, whereas developing technical solutions to finding, accessing and utilizing them. The curators therefore, are tasked with identifying and registering resources, examining data, writing configuration files to index and display data and keeping the contents current. In the initial phases of the project, all aspects of the registration and curation processes were manual. However, as the number of resources grew, manual curation became impractical. This report describes our experiences and successes with developing automated resource discovery and semiautomated type characterization with text-mining scripts that facilitate curation team efforts to discover, integrate and display new content. We also describe the DISCO framework, a suite of automated web services that significantly reduce manual curation efforts to periodically check for resource updates. Lastly, we discuss DOMEO, a semi-automated annotation tool that improves the discovery and curation of resources that are not necessarily website-based (i.e. reagents, software tools). Although the ultimate goal of automation was to reduce the workload of the curators, it has resulted in valuable analytic by-products that address accessibility, use and citation of resources that can now be shared with resource owners and the larger scientific community. DATABASE URL: http://neuinfo.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.