Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2012
Lactobacillus plantarum 299v does not reduce enteric bacteria or bacterial translocation in patients undergoing colon resection.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting the gut to heal the skin: probiotic supplementation reduces wound infection risk and clinical burden in critically ill patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- The Health Benefits of Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Pooled it
- The Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics on Wound Infection: A Systematic Review.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of probiotics and synbiotics on complications of wound infection after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of oral probiotic supplementation in mitigating postoperative surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of pre-, pro- and synbiotics supplementation in colorectal cancer treatment: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Perioperative Probiotics Application for Preventing Postoperative Complications in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Probiotics and synbiotics for preventing postoperative infectious complications in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Pooled it
- Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Pooled it
- Gastrointestinal surgery and the gut microbiome: a systematic literature review.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Probiotic/Synbiotic Treatment and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Search and Selection of Probiotics That Improve Mucositis Symptoms in Oncologic Patients. A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2019Pooled it
- Probiotics for preventing postoperative infection in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- [Early outcomes of elective surgery for colon cancer with preoperative mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized clinical trial].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2017Trial
- A Four-Probiotics Regimen Reduces Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.World journal of surgery · 2015Trial
- Review
- From Microbiota Correction to Host Protection: A New Therapeutic Target for the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on the length of hospital stays and risk of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Exploring the clinical value of probiotics in the perioperative management of colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProbiotics may exert beneficial effects in the gastrointestinal tract. This randomized trial investigated the effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on the intestinal load of potentially pathogenic bacteria, bacterial translocation, and cell proliferation in elective colon surgery.
methodsSeventy-five patients were randomized to pre- and postoperative oral intake of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v or placebo. Rectal swabs and mucosal biopsies were taken before the start of intake, after 1 week, at surgery, and after 6 days, weeks, and months. Viable counts were quantified for clostridia, Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-negative anaerobes, and lactobacilli. Bacterial translocation was determined by the analysis of bacterial DNA genes in mesenteric lymph nodes. Ki-67 was used as a marker of cell proliferation in normal mucosa and tumor.
resultsLactobacillus plantarum 299v was given without adverse effects. Lactobacillus plantarum 299v as well as Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-negative anaerobes increased in the colon 1 week after the administration of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v. There were no significant differences between patients receiving Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and placebo in the incidence of bacterial translocation (27 vs. 13%) and postoperative complications (16 vs. 31%).
conclusionsLactobacillus plantarum 299v was established in the intestine, but no inhibitory effect on enteric bacteria, bacterial translocation, or postoperative complications was found. The mechanism behind the protective effects of probiotics found in animal and some human studies remain elusive and require further explorations. No adverse effects were recorded after the administration of high doses of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.