Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22433830›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2011

Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist's perspective.

A Shenoy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Invited review--neuroimaging response assessment criteria for brain tumors in veterinary patients.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A ShenoyClatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Foundation Trust, Clatterbridge Road, Bebington, Wirral, UK. aditya.shenoy@ccotrust.nhs.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy is an important treatment modality in the management of brain tumours. Imaging biomarkers continue to be a focus of active investigation and there is increasing evidence of the utility of biomarkers in refining the overall management plan. This article briefly reviews the literature and outlines the possible clinical applications of imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrainBrain MappingBrain NeoplasmsDiagnostic ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical OncologyNeurologyPredictive Value of TestsRadiation InjuriesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22433830
PMCPMC3473905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.