Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22432580›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering2010

Unit operations of tissue development: epithelial folding.

Jeremiah J Zartman, Stanislav Y Shvartsman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cilia-driven epithelial folding and unfolding in an early diverging animal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremiah J ZartmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carl Icahn Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. jeremiah.zartman@imls.uzh.ch
Stanislav Y Shvartsman

Funding

Genome wide analysis and modeling of signal integration in the Drosophila ovaryR01GM078079 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SHVARTSMAN, STANISLAV Y. · 2006 to 2009
$978k
MSM: CR Multiscale analysis of epithelial patterning: m*R01GM076690 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SHVARTSMAN, STANISLAV Y. · 2005 to 2007
$691k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076690NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of multicellular organisms relies on a small set of construction techniques-assembly, sculpting, and folding-that are spatially and temporally regulated in a combinatorial manner to produce the diversity of tissues within the body. These basic processes are well conserved across tissue types and species at the level of both genes and mechanisms. Here we review the signaling, patterning, and biomechanical transformations that occur in two well-studied model systems of epithelial folding to illustrate both the complexity and modularity of tissue development. In particular, we discuss the possibility of a spatial code specifying morphogenesis. To decipher this code, engineers and scientists need to establish quantitative experimental systems and to develop models that address mechanisms at multiple levels of organization, from gene sequence to tissue biomechanics. In turn, quantitative models of embryogenesis can inspire novel methods for creating synthetic organs and treating degenerative tissue diseases.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEpitheliumHumansSignal TransductionSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID22432580
PMCPMC6049827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.