Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22432105›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2012

Glycemic control over 5 years in 4,900 people with type 2 diabetes: real-world diabetes therapy in a clinical trial cohort.

James D Best, Paul L Drury, Timothy M E Davis, Marja-Riitta Taskinen, Y Antero Kesäniemi, Russell Scott, Christopher Pardy, Merryn Voysey, Anthony C Keech, Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes Study Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

James D BestDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne Medical School, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. fieldtrial@ctc.usyd.edu.au
Paul L Drury
Timothy M E Davis
Marja-Riitta Taskinen
Y Antero Kesäniemi
Russell Scott
Christopher Pardy
Merryn Voysey
Anthony C Keech
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes Study Investigators
The University of Sydney · AUChristchurch Hospital · NZNational Health and Medical Research Council · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlycemic control in type 2 diabetes generally worsens over time, requiring intensification of therapy. The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial provided the opportunity to observe glycemic control in a real-world setting. We assessed the adequacy of metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin to maintain glycemic control and their effects on weight. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsDiabetes control was measured at baseline and yearly for a median of 5 years in the 4,900 patients from the nonintervention arm of this study allocated to placebo.

resultsMedian HbA(1c) was 6.9% at baseline and increased by an average of 0.22% over 5 years (P < 0.001). Median weight was 86.3 kg at baseline and decreased by 0.4 kg over 5 years (P = 0.002). Baseline therapy was lifestyle measures only in 27%, oral agents without insulin in 59%, and insulin in 14% (7% also taking oral agents). Over 5 years, insulin use increased to 32% (21% also taking oral agents). Use of oral agents remained similar at 56%. Only 2% of patients at baseline and 4% after 5 years were taking oral agents other than metformin or sulfonylureas. Initiation of insulin therapy in 855 patients produced a sustained reduction of HbA(1c) from a median of 8.2 to 7.7%, with a weight gain of 4.6 kg over 5 years.

conclusionsWith intensification of traditional therapies, glycemic control deteriorated very little over 5 years in a large cohort of type 2 diabetes. However, the requirement for insulin therapy doubled, at the expense of significant weight gain and risk of hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseBody WeightDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMetforminMiddle AgedSulfonylurea CompoundsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminSulfonylurea Compounds

Identifiers

PMID22432105
PMCPMC3329812
OpenAlexW2169211333

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.