Trial reportAnnals of internal medicine2012
Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Annals of internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 165 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Diabetes Control Through Peer Counseling and Incentives
Steps to Eliminate Postoperative Problems
The Effect of Financial Incentives on Improvement of Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients From Low Socioeconomic Background
The Military Spouse Resiliency Group (MSRG) Peer Support Program: Equipping Families For Resiliency With Tools (EFFRT)
Sleep Promotion Among Children Newly Diagnosed With Essential Hypertension
Who cites it
165 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 279 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peer Support in Chronic Conditions from the Peer Supporters' Perspective: A Systematic Review.Psychosocial intervention · 2025Pooled it
- Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The aims and effectiveness of communities of practice in healthcare: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Nonmedical Interventions For Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence, Actionable Strategies, And Policy Opportunities.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2022Pooled it
- Lifestyle interventions for type 2 diabetes management among migrants and ethnic minorities living in industrialized countries: a systematic review and meta-analyses.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Pooled it
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations:Diabetes care · 2020Guideline
- A Scoping Review of Behavioral Economic Interventions for Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Current diabetes reports · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Peer Support Interventions for Adults With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Hemoglobin AAnnals of family medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Financial incentives for a healthy life style and disease prevention among older people: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Personal financial incentives for changing habitual health-related behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Preventive medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC public health · 2015Pooled it
- Material need support interventions for diabetes prevention and control: a systematic review.Current diabetes reports · 2015Pooled it
- Characteristics and effectiveness of diabetes self-management educational programs targeted to racial/ethnic minority groups: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.BMC endocrine disorders · 2014Pooled it
- The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Current diabetes reports · 2012Pooled it
- Village doctor-led integrated care for older adults with diabetes in rural China: a cluster-randomized pilot trial.BMC geriatrics · 2026Trial
- Incentives and Equity: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Glycemic Control in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients With Diabetes.Annals of family medicine · 2026Trial
- Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- Using Peer Support to Prevent Diabetes: Results of a Pragmatic RCT.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023Trial
- Feasibility and outcomes from using a commitment device and text message reminders to increase adherence to time-restricted eating: A randomized trial.American heart journal · 2023Trial
105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- SummaryForPatientsIn
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCompared with white persons, African Americans have a greater incidence of diabetes, decreased control, and higher rates of microvascular complications. A peer mentorship model could be a scalable approach to improving control in this population and reducing disparities in diabetic outcomes.
objectiveTo determine whether peer mentors or financial incentives are superior to usual care in helping African American veterans decrease their hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels.
designA 6-month randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01125956)
settingPhiladelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: African American veterans aged 50 to 70 years with persistently poor diabetes control.
intervention118 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: usual care, a peer mentoring group, and a financial incentives group. Usual care patients were notified of their starting HbA(1c) level and recommended goals for HbA(1c). Those in the peer mentoring group were assigned a mentor who formerly had poor glycemic control but now had good control (HbA(1c) level ≤7.5%). The mentor was asked to talk with the patient at least once per week. Peer mentors were matched by race, sex, and age. Patients in the financial incentive group could earn $100 by decreasing their HbA(1c) level by 1% and $200 by decreasing it by 2% or to an HbA(1c) level of 6.5%. MEASUREMENTS: Change in HbA(1c) level at 6 months.
resultsMentors and mentees talked the most in the first month (mean calls, 4; range, 0 to 30), but calls decreased to a mean of 2 calls (range, 0 to 10) by the sixth month. Levels of HbA(1c) decreased from 9.9% to 9.8% in the control group, from 9.8% to 8.7% in the peer mentor group, and from 9.5% to 9.1% in the financial incentive group. Mean change in HbA(1c) level from baseline to 6 months relative to control was -1.07% (95% CI, -1.84% to -0.31%) in the peer mentor group and -0.45% (CI, -1.23% to 0.32%) in the financial incentive group. LIMITATION: The study included only veterans and lasted only 6 months.
conclusionPeer mentorship improved glucose control in a cohort of African American veterans with diabetes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging Roybal Center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.