Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22431625›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Genome-wide analysis of histone H3.1 and H3.3 variants in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Hume Stroud, Sofía Otero, Bénédicte Desvoyes, Elena Ramírez-Parra, Steven E Jacobsen, Crisanto Gutierrez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
24.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Epigenetics in the modern era of crop improvements.Science China. Life sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Identification of Plant Chromatin Interaction Networks Using IP-MS and co-IP.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Heterochromatin in plant meiosis.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hume StroudDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Sofía Otero
Bénédicte Desvoyes
Elena Ramírez-Parra
Steven E Jacobsen
Crisanto Gutierrez
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleosomes package eukaryotic DNA and are composed of four different histone proteins, designated H3, H4, H2A, and H2B. Histone H3 has two main variants, H3.1 and H3.3, which show different genomic localization patterns in animals. We profiled H3.1 and H3.3 variants in the genome of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana and found that the localization of these variants shows broad similarity in plants and animals, along with some unique features. H3.1 was enriched in silent areas of the genome, including regions containing the repressive chromatin modifications H3 lysine 27 methylation, H3 lysine 9 methylation, and DNA methylation. In contrast, H3.3 was enriched in actively transcribed genes, especially peaking at the 3' end of genes, and correlated with histone modifications associated with gene activation, such as histone H3 lysine 4 methylation and H2B ubiquitylation, as well as RNA Pol II occupancy. Surprisingly, both H3.1 and H3.3 were enriched on defined origins of replication, as was overall nucleosome density, suggesting a novel characteristic of plant origins. Our results are broadly consistent with the hypothesis that H3.1 acts as the canonical histone that is incorporated during DNA replication, whereas H3.3 acts as the replacement histone that can be incorporated outside of S-phase during chromatin-disrupting processes like transcription.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantArabidopsisChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA MethylationHistonesHistones

Identifiers

PMID22431625
PMCPMC3325649
OpenAlexW2076444968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.