Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22430830›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2012

Key advances in antihypertensive treatment.

Ludovit Paulis, Ulrike M Steckelings, Thomas Unger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Replacement of Amlodipine and Lercanidipine by Barnidipine: Tolerability and Effectiveness in a Real-Life Study.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Systolic hypertension: an increasing clinical challenge in Asia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel strategies for treatment of resistant hypertension.Kidney international supplements · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ludovit PaulisInstitute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ulrike M Steckelings
Thomas Unger
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although various effective treatments for hypertension are available, novel therapies to reduce elevated blood pressure, improve blood-pressure control, treat resistant hypertension, and reduce the associated cardiovascular risk factors are still required. A novel angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) was approved in 2011, and additional compounds are in development or being tested in clinical trials. Several of these agents have innovative mechanisms of action (an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, a natriuretic peptide agonist, a soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor, and an angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist) or dual activity (a combined ARB and neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, an ARB and endothelin receptor A blocker, and an endothelin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase inhibitor). In addition, several novel fixed-dose combinations of existing antihypertensive agents were approved in 2010-2011, including aliskiren double and triple combinations, and an olmesartan triple combination. Upcoming fixed-dose combinations are expected to introduce calcium-channel blockers other than amlodipine and diuretics other than hydrochlorothiazide. Finally, device-based approaches to the treatment of resistant hypertension, such as renal denervation and baroreceptor activation therapy, have shown promising results in clinical trials. However, technical improvements in the implantation procedure and devices used for baroreceptor activation therapy are required to address procedural safety concerns.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug ImplantsHumansHypertensionTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Implants

Identifiers

PMID22430830
OpenAlexW2055258353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.