ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012
Comparison on therapeutic effects of RFT and RCTVP regimen in the treatment of patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma in China.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety evaluation of fludarabine-based chemotherapy regimen for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Current status and progress of lymphoma management in China.International journal of hematology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of RFT (retuximab, fludarabine, pirarubicin) with RCTVP (retuximab, cyclophophamide, pirarubicin, vindesine and prednisone) in 248 indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. Two hundred and forty-eight patients with indolent B-cell NHL were treated with combined chemotherapy, including RFT and RCTVP, from January 2002 to December 2010 in Tianjin Cancer Hospital. The rate of response, toxicity and long-term survival for the two regimens were analyzed retrospectively. For the previously untreated patients, overall response rate for RFT arm and RCTVP arm was 71.7 and 70.6%, and complete response rate was 47.5 and 54.9%, respectively (P>0.05). For the refractory and relapsed patients, overall response (OR) rate and complete response (CR) rate were significantly improved in the RFT arm versus the RCTVP arm (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between treatment groups. Comparing with RCTVP regimen, fludarabine-based treatment was associated with superior PFS both in previously untreated, refractory and relapsed patients. WHO grades 3 and 4 hematological adverse events were more common in the RFT arm. Neurotoxicity was more common in the RCTVP arm. For the previously untreated patients, there was no difference between RFT arm and RCTVP arm on OR and CR rates. For the refractory and relapsed indolent B-cell NHL patients who received RFT regimen achieved higher OR and CR rates compared with RCTVP-treated patients. No differences in OS were noted. RFT regimen was associated with superior PFS both in previously untreated, refractory and relapsed patients. RFT regimen is effective and well tolerated for patients with untreated, refractory and relapsed indolent B-cell NHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.