Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22430559›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2012

The three human monocyte subsets: implications for health and disease.

Kok Loon Wong, Wei Hseun Yeap, June Jing Yi Tai, Siew Min Ong, Truong Minh Dang, Siew Cheng Wong

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 396 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
396citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

396 citing papers in PubMed, 657 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

336 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kok Loon WongSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 8A Biomedical Grove, #04/04 Immunos, Biopolis, Singapore.
Wei Hseun Yeap
June Jing Yi Tai
Siew Min Ong
Truong Minh Dang
Siew Cheng Wong
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSingapore Immunology Network · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human blood monocytes are heterogeneous and conventionally subdivided into two subsets based on CD16 expression. Recently, the official nomenclature subdivides monocytes into three subsets, the additional subset arising from the segregation of the CD16+ monocytes into two based on relative expression of CD14. Recent whole genome analysis reveal that specialized functions and phenotypes can be attributed to these newly defined monocyte subsets. In this review, we discuss these recent results, and also the description and utility of this new segregation in several disease conditions. We also discuss alternative markers for segregating the monocyte subsets, for example using Tie-2 and slan, which do not necessarily follow the official method of segregating monocyte subsets based on relative CD14 and CD16 expressions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell SeparationHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMonocytesNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicReceptors, IgGReceptor, TIE-2Tumor Suppressor ProteinsWound HealingBiomarkersLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsReceptors, IgGReceptor, TIE-2SECISBP2L protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22430559
OpenAlexW2092617134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.