ReviewDer Anaesthesist2012
[Organ protective intensive care treatment and simulation-based training].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Simulation-based training and OR apprenticeship for medical students : A prospective, randomized, single-blind study of clinical skills].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Trial
- Brain Death and Organ Donation in Paediatric Intensive Care Unit.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2019Article
- Medical Management of Brain-Dead Organ Donors.Acute and critical care · 2019Review
- Organ-Protective Intensive Care in Organ Donors.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Germany the extent of organ donation is still inadequate and not sufficient to address patients on the waiting lists. Nevertheless, intensive care treatment of potential organ donors does not receive adequate attention. However, because of the increasing age and comorbidities of organ donors in recent years, a sufficient intensive care treatment is indispensable for the success of organ transplantations. Sufficient randomized clinical trials are lacking. This article reviews the current literature and describes approaches for improvement. Multicentre studies and education of medical staff of intensive care units, for example in intensive care simulation for organ protection, could potentially be a successful approach. The improvement and establishment of curricular training and education particularly in simulation workshops might be a promising approach to enhance the quantity and quality of organ donations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.