Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22430431›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2012

The 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan as a potential treatment of migraine attacks: a review of two placebo-controlled phase II trials.

Peer C Tfelt-Hansen, Jes Olesen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Short-term efficacy and safety of lasmiditan, a novel 5-HTThe journal of headache and pain · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The role of hippocampal 5-HTNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  4. Lasmiditan: Acute Migraine Treatment Without Vasoconstriction. A Review.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeted 5-HTNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Update on future headache treatments.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peer C Tfelt-HansenDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark. ptha@glo.regionh.dk
Jes Olesen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lasmiditan is a novel selective 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist. It is both scientifically and clinically relevant to review whether a 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist is effective in the acute treatment of migraine. Two RCTs in the phase II development of lasmiditan was reviewed. In the intravenous placebo-controlled RCT, lasmiditan doses of 2.5-45 mg were used, and there was a linear association between headache relief (HR) rates and dose levels (P < 0.02). For lasmiditan 20 mg, HR was 64 % and for placebo it was 45 % (NS). In the oral placebo-controlled RCT, lasmiditan doses of 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg were used. For HR, all doses of lasmiditan were superior to placebo (P < 0.05). For lasmiditan 400 mg, HR was 64 % and it was 25 % for placebo. Adverse events (AEs) emerging from the treatment were reported by 22 % of the patients receiving placebo and by 65, 73, 87 and 87 % of patients receiving 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg, respectively. The majority of AEs after lasmiditan 100 and 400 mg were moderate or severe. For the understanding of migraine pathophysiology, it is very important to note that a selective 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist like lasmiditan is effective in the acute treatment of migraine. Thus, migraine can be treated with a drug that has no vasoconstrictor ability. While lasmiditan most likely is effective in the treatment of migraine attacks it had, unfortunately, a high incidence of CNS related AEs in the oral RCT. If confirmed in larger studies in phase III, this might adversely limit the use of this highly specific non-vascular acute treatment of migraine. Larger studies including the parameters of patients' preferences are necessary to accurately position this new treatment principle in relation to the triptans.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicAnimalsBenzamidesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMigraine DisordersPiperidinesPyridinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSerotonin Receptor AgonistsBenzamideslasmiditanPiperidinesPyridinesSerotonin Receptor Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22430431
PMCPMC3356470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.