Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22429653›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2012

Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in clinically healthy German sheep flocks.

Angela Hilbert, Gernot Schmoock, Hannah Lenzko, Udo Moog, Roland Diller, Andreas Fröhlich, Lothar Hoffmann, Steffen Horner, Michael Elschner, Herbert Tomaso and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular detection and phylogeny analysis ofNew microbes and new infections · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence ofEpidemiology and infection · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Coxiella burnetii - Pathogenic Agent of Q (Query) Fever.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela HilbertInstitut für Epidemiologie, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, National Reference Laboratory for Q-fever, Wusterhausen, Germany.
Gernot Schmoock
Hannah Lenzko
Udo Moog
Roland Diller
Andreas Fröhlich
Lothar Hoffmann
Steffen Horner
Michael Elschner
Herbert Tomaso
Klaus Henning
Heinrich Neubauer
Lisa D Sprague
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DELower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety · DEMinisterium für Soziales und Integration Baden-Württemberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent epidemiological data on the situation of Coxiella (C.) burnetii infections in sheep are missing, making risk assessment and the implementation of counteractive measures difficult. Using the German state of Thuringia as a model example, the estimated sero-, and antigen prevalence of C. burnetii (10% and 25%, respectively) was assessed at flock level in 39/252 randomly selected clinically healthy sheep flocks with more than 100 ewes and unknown abortion rate.

resultsThe CHECKIT™ Q-fever Test Kit identified 11 (28%) antibody positive herds, whereas real-time PCR revealed the presence of C. burnetii DNA in 2 (5%) of the flocks. Multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeats analysis of 9 isolates obtained from one flock revealed identical profiles. All isolates contained the plasmid QpH1.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that C. burnetii is present in clinically inconspicuous sheep flocks and sporadic flare-ups do occur as the notifications to the German animal disease reporting system show. Although C. burnetii infections are not a primary veterinary concern due to the lack of significant clinical impact on animal health (with the exception of goats), the eminent zoonotic risk for humans should not be underestimated. Therefore, strategies combining the interests of public and veterinary public health should include monitoring of flocks, the identification and culling of shedders as well as the administration of protective vaccines.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryAnimalsAntigens, BacterialCoxiella burnetiiDNA, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGermanyHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceQ FeverRisk AssessmentAntigens, BacterialDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22429653
PMCPMC3351016
OpenAlexW2026633455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.