Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22429431›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Power and powerlessness: GPs' narratives about lifestyle counselling.

Eirik Abildsnes, Liv Tveit Walseth, Signe A Flottorp, Per S Stensland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Obesity in primary care: a qualitative synthesis of patient and practitioner perspectives on roles and responsibilities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eirik AbildsnesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. eabil@broadpark.no
Liv Tveit Walseth
Signe A Flottorp
Per S Stensland
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPower in doctor-patient relationships is asymmetrically distributed. The doctor holds resources the patient needs and has a mandate to promote healthy living. Power may benefit or harm the patients' health, and the doctor-patient relationship.

aimTo identify aspects of power and powerlessness in GPs' narratives about lifestyle counselling. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study using focus groups from peer-group meetings of Norwegian GPs attending continuing medical education.

methodGPs discussed case stories about lifestyle counselling in focus groups. The discussions were transcribed and the text analysed using systematic text condensation.

resultsAspects of power concerning the framework of the consultation and the GPs' professional role were found. Also identified were: power expressed by opportunistic approaches to change patients' lifestyle; rhetoric communication; paternalism; and disclosure. GPs reported powerlessness in complex communication, when there were difficulties reaching goals, and when patients resisted or ignored their proposals.

conclusionCase-study discussions in peer groups disclose several aspects of power and powerlessness that occur in consultations. Consciousness about aspects of power may facilitate counselling that benefits the patient and the doctor-patient relationship.

Indexed as

CommunicationLife StylePhysician-Patient RelationsPower, PsychologicalAttitude of Health PersonnelCounselingDisclosureEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeFocus GroupsHumansNarrationNorwayPaternalismProfessional Role

Identifiers

PMID22429431
PMCPMC3289821
OpenAlexW2073108749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.