Genetic advances in medicine: has the promise been fulfilled in general practice?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Maintaining psychological well-being when living at risk of Huntington's disease: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025
   Article
2. Precision health: A nursing perspective.International journal of nursing sciences · 2020
   Review
3. Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2018
   Article
4. A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2018
   Review
5. Chronic disease prevention in primary care: how and when will genomics impact?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
   Article
6. Computing Clinically Relevant Binding Free Energies of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2014
   Article
7. Improving the management of people with a family history of breast cancer in primary care: before and after study of audit-based education.BMC family practice · 2013
   Article
8. Development and evaluation of a brief self-completed family history screening tool for common chronic disease prevention in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
   Article
9. Assessment of cancer risk in men and women.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
   Article
10. Development and validation of a family history screening questionnaire in Australian primary care.Annals of family medicine
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as