Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Association of symptoms at heart failure diagnosis with hospitalisation and mortality at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care health records.BMJ open · 2026
   Article
2. Service evaluation: identification of gaps in choking prevention advice for children in the South Coast of England, UK.Family medicine and community health · 2023
   Article
3. Self-prescription.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
   Article
4. Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care.BJGP open · 2020
   Article
5. Assessing the performance and satisfaction of medical residents utilizing standardized patient versus mannequin-simulated training.Advances in medical education and practice · 2017
   Article
6. A Practical Guide to Engaging Individuals with Obesity.Obesity facts · 2016
   Review
7. Primary care delays in diagnosing cancer: what is causing them and what can we do about them?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2013
   Article
8. Sharing control of appointment length with patients in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
   Article
9. Sharing control of appointment length with patients in general practice: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
   Article
10. Enhancing consultations with interpreters: learning more about how.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
11. Improving the reporting and interpretation of clinical trial outcomes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
12. Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
13. Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.2012
• Commented on by
  Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.2012
• Comment on
  Clinicians' perceptions of reporting methods for back pain trials: a qualitative study.2012
• Comment on
  Power and powerlessness: GPs' narratives about lifestyle counselling.2012
• Comment on
  Detection of patient psychological distress and longitudinal patient-doctor relationships: a cross-sectional study.2012
• Comment on
  Communicating risk to patients and the public.2012

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as