Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22429330›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2012

Relevance of PTEN loss in brain metastasis formation in breast cancer patients.

Harriet Wikman, Katrin Lamszus, Niclas Detels, Liubov Uslar, Michaela Wrage, Christian Benner, Ina Hohensee, Bauke Ylstra, Kathrin Eylmann, Marc Zapatka and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Harriet WikmanInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistreet 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. h.wikman@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Katrin Lamszus
Niclas Detels
Liubov Uslar
Michaela Wrage
Christian Benner
Ina Hohensee
Bauke Ylstra
Kathrin Eylmann
Marc Zapatka
Guido Sauter
Dirk Kemming
Markus Glatzel
Volkmar Müller
Manfred Westphal
Klaus Pantel
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the improvement of therapeutic options for the treatment of breast cancer, the development of brain metastases has become a major limitation to life expectancy in many patients. Therefore, our aim was to identify molecular markers associated with the development of brain metastases in breast cancer.

methodsPatterns of chromosomal aberrations in primary breast tumors and brain metastases were compared with array-comparative genetic hybridization (CGH). The most significant region was further characterized in more detail by microsatellite and gene-expression analysis, and finally, the possible target gene was screened for mutations.

resultsThe array CGH results showed that brain metastases, in general, display similar chromosomal aberrations as do primary tumors, but with a notably higher frequency. Statistically significant differences were found at nine different chromosomal loci, with a gain and amplification of EGFR (7p11.2) and a loss of 10q22.3-qter being among the most significant aberrations in brain metastases (P < 0.01; false discovery rate (fdr) < 0.04). Allelic imbalance (AI) patterns at 10q were further verified in 77 unmatched primary tumors and 21 brain metastases. AI at PTEN loci was found significantly more often in brain metastases (52%) and primary tumors with a brain relapse (59%) compared with primary tumors from patients without relapse (18%; P = 0.003) or relapse other than brain tumors (12%; P = 0.006). Loss of PTEN was especially frequent in HER2-negative brain metastases (64%). Furthermore, PTEN mRNA expression was significantly downregulated in brain metastases compared with primary tumors, and PTEN mutations were frequently found in brain metastases.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that brain metastases often show very complex genomic-aberration patterns, suggesting a potential role of PTEN and EGFR in brain metastasis formation.

Indexed as

Allelic ImbalanceBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsChromosome AberrationsChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 10Comparative Genomic HybridizationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedMutationPTEN PhosphohydrolaseEGFR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22429330
PMCPMC3446383
OpenAlexW2167165223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.