Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22429310›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2012

Chestnut resistance to the blight disease: insights from transcriptome analysis.

Abdelali Barakat, Meg Staton, Chun-Huai Cheng, Joseph Park, Norzawani Buang M Yassin, Stephen Ficklin, Chia-Chun Yeh, Fred Hebard, Kathleen Baier, William Powell and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BreedingFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  4. Dual transcriptomic analysis reveals early inducedFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Identification of Susceptibility Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdelali BarakatThe School of Forest Resources, and The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 326 Forest Resources Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. abaraka@clemson.edu
Meg Staton
Chun-Huai Cheng
Joseph Park
Norzawani Buang M Yassin
Stephen Ficklin
Chia-Chun Yeh
Fred Hebard
Kathleen Baier
William Powell
Stephan C Schuster
Nicholas Wheeler
Albert Abbott
John E Carlson
Ronald Sederoff
Pennsylvania State University · USNorth Carolina State University · USState University of New York · USClemson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA century ago, Chestnut Blight Disease (CBD) devastated the American chestnut. Backcross breeding has been underway to introgress resistance from Chinese chestnut into surviving American chestnut genotypes. Development of genomic resources for the family Fagaceae, has focused in this project on Castanea mollissima Blume (Chinese chestnut) and Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh (American chestnut) to aid in the backcross breeding effort and in the eventual identification of blight resistance genes through genomic sequencing and map based cloning. A previous study reported partial characterization of the transcriptomes from these two species. Here, further analyses of a larger dataset and assemblies including both 454 and capillary sequences were performed and defense related genes with differential transcript abundance (GDTA) in canker versus healthy stem tissues were identified.

resultsOver one and a half million cDNA reads were assembled into 34,800 transcript contigs from American chestnut and 48,335 transcript contigs from Chinese chestnut. Chestnut cDNA showed higher coding sequence similarity to genes in other woody plants than in herbaceous species. The number of genes tagged, the length of coding sequences, and the numbers of tagged members within gene families showed that the cDNA dataset provides a good resource for studying the American and Chinese chestnut transcriptomes. In silico analysis of transcript abundance identified hundreds of GDTA in canker versus healthy stem tissues. A significant number of additional DTA genes involved in the defense-response not reported in a previous study were identified here. These DTA genes belong to various pathways involving cell wall biosynthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), salicylic acid (SA), ethylene, jasmonic acid (JA), abscissic acid (ABA), and hormone signalling. DTA genes were also identified in the hypersensitive response and programmed cell death (PCD) pathways. These DTA genes are candidates for host resistance to the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica.

conclusionsOur data allowed the identification of many genes and gene network candidates for host resistance to the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. The similar set of GDTAs in American chestnut and Chinese chestnut suggests that the variation in sensitivity to this pathogen between these species may be the result of different timing and amplitude of the response of the two to the pathogen infection. Resources developed in this study are useful for functional genomics, comparative genomics, resistance breeding and phylogenetics in the Fagaceae.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceAscomycotaBreedingCloning, MolecularContig MappingDatabases, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryFagaceaeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene LibraryGenes, PlantInbreedingPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlant StemsDNA, ComplementaryProteomeRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22429310
PMCPMC3376029
OpenAlexW2024229465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.