Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22427979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Differential interactions of sex pheromone and plant odour in the olfactory pathway of a male moth.

Nina Deisig, Jan Kropf, Simon Vitecek, Delphine Pevergne, Angela Rouyar, Jean-Christophe Sandoz, Philippe Lucas, Christophe Gadenne, Sylvia Anton, Romina Barrozo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biological constraints on configural odour mixture perception.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A plant volatile alters the perception of sex pheromone blend ratios in a moth.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nina DeisigUMR 1272 Physiologie de l'Insecte: Signalisation et Communication, INRA, Route de Saint-Cyr, Versailles, France, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 Quai Saint Bernard, Paris, France.
Jan Kropf
Simon Vitecek
Delphine Pevergne
Angela Rouyar
Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Philippe Lucas
Christophe Gadenne
Sylvia Anton
Romina Barrozo
Sorbonne Université · FRÉvolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie · FRSignalisation Fonctionnelle des Canaux Ioniques et Récepteurs · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most animals rely on olfaction to find sexual partners, food or a habitat. The olfactory system faces the challenge of extracting meaningful information from a noisy odorous environment. In most moth species, males respond to sex pheromone emitted by females in an environment with abundant plant volatiles. Plant odours could either facilitate the localization of females (females calling on host plants), mask the female pheromone or they could be neutral without any effect on the pheromone. Here we studied how mixtures of a behaviourally-attractive floral odour, heptanal, and the sex pheromone are encoded at different levels of the olfactory pathway in males of the noctuid moth Agrotis ipsilon. In addition, we asked how interactions between the two odorants change as a function of the males' mating status. We investigated mixture detection in both the pheromone-specific and in the general odorant pathway. We used a) recordings from individual sensilla to study responses of olfactory receptor neurons, b) in vivo calcium imaging with a bath-applied dye to characterize the global input response in the primary olfactory centre, the antennal lobe and c) intracellular recordings of antennal lobe output neurons, projection neurons, in virgin and newly-mated males. Our results show that heptanal reduces pheromone sensitivity at the peripheral and central olfactory level independently of the mating status. Contrarily, heptanal-responding olfactory receptor neurons are not influenced by pheromone in a mixture, although some post-mating modulation occurs at the input of the sexually isomorphic ordinary glomeruli, where general odours are processed within the antennal lobe. The results are discussed in the context of mate localization.

Indexed as

AldehydesAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsChemotaxisMaleMothsOdorantsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalSmellAldehydesheptanalSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID22427979
PMCPMC3299628
OpenAlexW1975658870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.