Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22427848›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Specific versus non-specific immune responses in an invertebrate species evidenced by a comparative de novo sequencing study.

Emeline Deleury, Géraldine Dubreuil, Namasivayam Elangovan, Eric Wajnberg, Jean-Marc Reichhart, Benjamin Gourbal, David Duval, Olga Lucia Baron, Jérôme Gouzy, Christine Coustau

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Examining adaptive evolution of immune activity: opportunities provided by gastropods in the age of 'omics'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomphalaria glabrata immunity: Post-genome advances.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative immunogenomics of molluscs.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emeline DeleuryINRA/CNRS/UNS, Institut Sophia Agrobiotech, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Géraldine Dubreuil
Namasivayam Elangovan
Eric Wajnberg
Jean-Marc Reichhart
Benjamin Gourbal
David Duval
Olga Lucia Baron
Jérôme Gouzy
Christine Coustau

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our present understanding of the functioning and evolutionary history of invertebrate innate immunity derives mostly from studies on a few model species belonging to ecdysozoa. In particular, the characterization of signaling pathways dedicated to specific responses towards fungi and Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria in Drosophila melanogaster challenged our original view of a non-specific immunity in invertebrates. However, much remains to be elucidated from lophotrochozoan species. To investigate the global specificity of the immune response in the fresh-water snail Biomphalaria glabrata, we used massive Illumina sequencing of 5'-end cDNAs to compare expression profiles after challenge by Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria or after a yeast challenge. 5'-end cDNA sequencing of the libraries yielded over 12 millions high quality reads. To link these short reads to expressed genes, we prepared a reference transcriptomic database through automatic assembly and annotation of the 758,510 redundant sequences (ESTs, mRNAs) of B. glabrata available in public databases. Computational analysis of Illumina reads followed by multivariate analyses allowed identification of 1685 candidate transcripts differentially expressed after an immune challenge, with a two fold ratio between transcripts showing a challenge-specific expression versus a lower or non-specific differential expression. Differential expression has been validated using quantitative PCR for a subset of randomly selected candidates. Predicted functions of annotated candidates (approx. 700 unisequences) belonged to a large extend to similar functional categories or protein types. This work significantly expands upon previous gene discovery and expression studies on B. glabrata and suggests that responses to various pathogens may involve similar immune processes or signaling pathways but different genes belonging to multigenic families. These results raise the question of the importance of gene duplication and acquisition of paralog functional diversity in the evolution of specific invertebrate immune responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomphalariaCalmodulinCluster AnalysisDNA, ComplementaryExpressed Sequence TagsFerritinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunity, InnatePhylogenyReceptors, Pattern RecognitionRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionZinc FingersCalmodulinDNA, ComplementaryFerritinsReceptors, Pattern RecognitionRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22427848
PMCPMC3299671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.