Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22427797›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

DNA methylation-independent reversion of gemcitabine resistance by hydralazine in cervical cancer cells.

Myrna Candelaria, Erick de la Cruz-Hernandez, Lucia Taja-Chayeb, Enrique Perez-Cardenas, Catalina Trejo-Becerril, Aurora Gonzalez-Fierro, Alma Chavez-Blanco, Ernesto Soto-Reyes, Guadalupe Dominguez, Jaenai E Trujillo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DNMT Enzymes and Their Impact on Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Inhibitors of DNA Methylation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Histone methyltransferase and drug resistance in cancers.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myrna CandelariaDivision of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.
Erick de la Cruz-Hernandez
Lucia Taja-Chayeb
Enrique Perez-Cardenas
Catalina Trejo-Becerril
Aurora Gonzalez-Fierro
Alma Chavez-Blanco
Ernesto Soto-Reyes
Guadalupe Dominguez
Jaenai E Trujillo
Jose Diaz-Chavez
Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDown regulation of genes coding for nucleoside transporters and drug metabolism responsible for uptake and metabolic activation of the nucleoside gemcitabine is related with acquired tumor resistance against this agent. Hydralazine has been shown to reverse doxorubicin resistance in a model of breast cancer. Here we wanted to investigate whether epigenetic mechanisms are responsible for acquiring resistance to gemcitabine and if hydralazine could restore gemcitabine sensitivity in cervical cancer cells. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe cervical cancer cell line CaLo cell line was cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations of gemcitabine. Down-regulation of hENT1 & dCK genes was observed in the resistant cells (CaLoGR) which was not associated with promoter methylation. Treatment with hydralazine reversed gemcitabine resistance and led to hENT1 and dCK gene reactivation in a DNA promoter methylation-independent manner. No changes in HDAC total activity nor in H3 and H4 acetylation at these promoters were observed. ChIP analysis showed H3K9m2 at hENT1 and dCK gene promoters which correlated with hyper-expression of G9A histone methyltransferase at RNA and protein level in the resistant cells. Hydralazine inhibited G9A methyltransferase activity in vitro and depletion of the G9A gene by iRNA restored gemcitabine sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate that acquired gemcitabine resistance is associated with DNA promoter methylation-independent hENT1 and dCK gene down-regulation and hyper-expression of G9A methyltransferase. Hydralazine reverts gemcitabine resistance in cervical cancer cells via inhibition of G9A histone methyltransferase.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticBlotting, WesternCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDeoxycytidineDNA PrimersDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpigenesis, GeneticEquilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1FemaleGemcitabineGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistocompatibility AntigensHistone DeacetylasesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineDNA PrimersEHMT2 protein, humanEquilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1GemcitabineHistocompatibility AntigensHistone DeacetylasesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHydralazineSLC29A1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22427797
PMCPMC3299634
OpenAlexW2117423650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.