ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2010
Postprandial metabolic heterogeneity in men with primary dyslipidaemia.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Is it time to break the fast?-a paradigm shift in clinical lipidology.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Influence of metabolic syndrome superposition on familial combined hyperlipoproteinemia cardiovascular complication rate.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2013Article
- Lipids, blood pressure, kidney - what was new in 2011?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2011Article
- The impact of statin therapy on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in an outpatient cardiology practice.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2011Article
- Does combination therapy with statins and fibrates prevent cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients with atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia?The review of diabetic studies : RDSReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFamilial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH) and familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have been strongly linked to premature coronary artery disease. Postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia is also associated with atherosclerotic disease. We evaluated the postprandial lipaemia in men with FCH and FH and compared them to a group of healthy men. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study population consisted of 83 men: 34 FCH, 29 FH and 20 healthy. The FCH and FH groups were further divided into five subgroups, according to their lipid phenotype: FCH-IIA (n = 13), FCH-IIB (n = 10), FCH-IV (n = 11), FH-IIA (n = 21) and FH-IIB (n = 8). Postprandial lipaemia was evaluated by the areas under the curve for triglyceride (TG) concentrations (TG-AUC).
resultsThe TG levels after oral fat tolerance test were significantly higher in FCH, compared to FH and healthy groups (TG-AUC in mg/dl/h; 2678 ±1415 vs. 1503 ±1147 and 1011 ±652 respectively, p < 0.001). The postprandial response was higher in FCH-IV and FCH-IIB, compared to FCH-IIA (TG-AUC in mg/dl/h; 3220 ±824 or 3409 ±770 vs. 1863 ±577 respectively, p < 0.001, for both comparisons). The FCH-IIA group showed higher postprandial TG levels when compared to FH-IIA (TG-AUC in mg/dl/h; 1863 ±577 vs. 1374 ±428 respectively, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences between FH-IIB and FCH-IIB subgroups. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.907, p < 0.001) between the postprandial TG-AUC and fasting TG levels in all FCH subjects.
conclusionsAll phenotypes of FCH and the FH IIB phenotype demonstrate an exaggerated postprandial response that could partially contribute to the high cardiovascular risk. These patients should be identified and treated early with the appropriate hypolipidaemic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.