Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22426872›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2012

A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Ash K Monga, Michael R Tracey, Jeyakumar Subbaroyan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05309993 (INvestigation of TENS Efficacy Versus Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05309993 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

INvestigation of TENS Efficacy Versus Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2022 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urinary Urge Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsPTNS, TENS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The management of childhood urinary incontinence.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ash K MongaPrincess Anne Hospital, Urodynamics Unit, Level G, Coxford Road, Southampton S016 5YA, UK. ashmonga@aol.com
Michael R Tracey
Jeyakumar Subbaroyan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this manuscript was to provide a systematic literature review of clinical trial evidence for a range of electrical stimulation therapies in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

methodsThe databases MEDLINE, BIOSIS Previews, Inside Conferences, and EMBASE were searched. Original clinical studies with greater than 15 subjects were included.

resultsSeventy-three studies were included, representing implanted sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) therapy modalities.

conclusionsMedian mean reductions in incontinence episodes and voiding frequency were similar for implanted SNS and PTNS. However, long-term follow-up data to validate the sustained benefit of PTNS are lacking. Despite a substantial body of research devoted to SNS validation, it is not possible to definitively define the appropriate role of this therapy owing largely to study design flaws that inhibited rigorous intention to treat analyses for the majority of these studies.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyHumansIncidenceLower Urinary Tract SymptomsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.