ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1990
Cellular immunity in experimental Echinococcus multilocularis infection. I. Sequential and comparative study of specific in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity against E. multilocularis antigens in resistant and sensitive mice.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urotensin II and urantide exert opposite effects on the cellular components of atherosclerotic plaque in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020Article
- T-cell tolerance and exhaustion in the clearance of Echinococcus multilocularis: role of inoculum size in a quantitative hepatic experimental model.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Echinococcus multilocularis infection in the field vole (Microtus agrestis): an ecological model for studies on transmission dynamics.Parasitology research · 2015Article
- The Potential Role of Th9 Cell Related Cytokine and Transcription Factors in Patients with Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis.Journal of immunology research · 2015Article
- Echinococcus multilocularis and its intermediate host: a model of parasite-host interplay.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010Review
- Serum sIL-2R, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma in alveolar echinococcosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2004Article
- Echinococcosis and allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2004Review
- Resistance/susceptibility to Echinococcus multilocularis infection and cytokine profile in humans. II. Influence of the HLA B8, DR3, DQ2 haplotype.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2000Article
- Echinococcus multilocularis: parasite-specific humoral and cellular immune response subsets in mouse strains susceptible (AKR, C57B1/6J) or 'resistant' (C57B1/10) to secondary alveolar echinococcosis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 1994Article
- Lymphocyte engraftment conveys immunity and alters parasite development in scid mice infected with Echinococcus multilocularis.Parasitology research · 1993Article
- Molecular and immunological diagnosis of echinococcosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1992Review
- Cellular immunity in experimental Echinococcus multilocularis infection. II. Sequential and comparative phenotypic study of the periparasitic mononuclear cells in resistant and sensitive mice.Clinical and experimental immunology · 1990Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species- or strain-related differences in receptivity of intermediate hosts to E. multilocularis larvae could be related to differences in specific cellular immune response of the host. In order to test this hypothesis, we assessed the delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to E. multilocularis antigens (EmAg) in mice of three strains differing by their sensitivity (AKR and C57BL.6) or resistance (C57BL.10) to E. multilocularis infection. DTH was determined by measuring in vivo the foot-pad response 24 h after an EmAg antigenic challenge. The level of positive response was evaluated in immunized mice; however, a typical DTH response was only observed by immunizing mice with a strong adjuvant schedule. Course of DTH in the immunized mice was shown to be somewhat different in sensitive and resistant mice. The differences were much more marked in mice infected with proliferative E. multilocularis larvae. The levels of the footpad response was significantly higher in resistant mice, although the peak of the reaction was obtained later than in sensitive mice. DTH, expressed by the foot-pad response against EmAg, remained significant for the entire period of observation in sensitive as well as in resistant mice. There was no correlation between receptivity of the murine hosts and levels of specific antibodies against EmAg. These results suggest a relationship between resistance to E. multilocularis infection and intensity and/or course of DTH in mice. The resistance could be mediated by some particularities of the in situ cellular immune response in the periparasitic granuloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.