Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22426105›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2012

Limited dedifferentiation provides replacement tissue during zebrafish fin regeneration.

Scott Stewart, Kryn Stankunas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fin ray branching is defined by TRAPProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Animal regeneration in the era of transcriptomics.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  20. Zebrafish as a Model for Germ Cell Regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Scott StewartInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1229, USA. sstewart@molbio.uoregon.edu
Kryn Stankunas
Oregon Research Institute · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Chromatin Remodeling in Cardiovascular DevelopmentR00HL087598 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI STANKUNAS, KRYN · 2010 to 2012
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS 5R00HL087598NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL087598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike humans, some vertebrate animals are able to completely regenerate damaged appendages and other organs. For example, adult zebrafish will regenerate the complex structure of an amputated caudal fin to a degree that the original and replacement fins are indistinguishable. The blastema, a mass of cells that uniquely forms following appendage amputation in regenerating animals, is the major source of regenerated tissue. However, the cell lineage(s) that contribute to the blastema and their ultimate contribution(s) to the regenerated fin have not been definitively characterized. It has been suggested that cells near the amputation site dedifferentiate forming multipotent progenitors that populate the blastema and then give rise to multiple cell types of the regenerated fin. Other studies propose that blastema cells are non-uniform populations that remain restricted in their potential to contribute to different cell lineages. We tested these models by using inducible Cre-lox technology to generate adult zebrafish with distinct, isolated groups of genetically labeled cells within the caudal fin. We then tracked populations of several cell types over the entire course of fin regeneration in individual animals. We found no evidence for the existence of multipotent progenitors. Instead, multiple cell types, including epidermal cells, intra-ray fibroblasts, and osteoblasts, contribute to the newly regenerated tissue while remaining highly restricted with respect to their developmental identity. Our studies further demonstrate that the regenerating fin consists of many repeating blastema "units" dedicated to each fin ray. These blastemas each have an organized structure of lineage restricted, dedifferentiated cells that cooperate to regenerate the caudal fin.

Indexed as

Cell DedifferentiationRegenerationAnimal FinsAnimalsCell MovementEpidermal CellsFibroblastsIntegrasesMultipotent Stem CellsOsteoblastsZebrafishCre recombinaseIntegrases

Identifiers

PMID22426105
PMCPMC3370987
OpenAlexW1965172427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.