Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22425659›Full record

ReviewProtein expression and purification2012

Engineering genes for predictable protein expression.

Claes Gustafsson, Jeremy Minshull, Sridhar Govindarajan, Jon Ness, Alan Villalobos, Mark Welch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein expression and purification, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Composition and Codon Usage Pattern Results in Divergence of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Determinants of efficient modulation of ribosomal traffic jams.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claes GustafssonDNA2.0 Inc., 1140 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Jeremy Minshull
Sridhar Govindarajan
Jon Ness
Alan Villalobos
Mark Welch

Funding

Yeast ExpressionP50GM073210 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STROUD, ROBERT M · 2004 to 2013
$21.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM073210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA sequence used to encode a polypeptide can have dramatic effects on its expression. Lack of readily available tools has until recently inhibited meaningful experimental investigation of this phenomenon. Advances in synthetic biology and the application of modern engineering approaches now provide the tools for systematic analysis of the sequence variables affecting heterologous expression of recombinant proteins. We here discuss how these new tools are being applied and how they circumvent the constraints of previous approaches, highlighting some of the surprising and promising results emerging from the developing field of gene engineering.

Indexed as

CodonGene LibraryGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsHumansOpen Reading FramesRecombinant ProteinsSynthetic BiologyCodonRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22425659
PMCPMC3746766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.