ReviewTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2012
New paradigms in translational science research in cancer biomarkers.
Review in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Salivary metabolites to detect patients with cancer: a systematic review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluation of serum nucleoside diphosphate kinase A for the detection of colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Cervical Cancer Biomarkers in Non-Cervical Samples: Emerging Tools for Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Current Trends in the Biomarker's Discovery for the Treatment and Management of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Cancer antigen 153: A risk factor for ocular metastases in patients with breast cancer.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Structured tracking of alcohol reinforcement (STAR) for basic and translational alcohol research.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Article
- Exploration of biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of cervical cancer: a review.Discover oncology · 2022Review
- Stem Cell Biomarkers and Tumorigenesis in Gastric Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Plasma-Engineered Polymers for Biomarker-Based Viral Detection and Highly Multiplexed Analysis.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Editorial: Molecular Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- The Early Detection Research Network: A National Infrastructure to Support the Discovery, Development, and Validation of Cancer Biomarkers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Review
- Value of Serum NEUROG1 Methylation for the Detection of Advanced Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Systematic comparison of plasma EBV DNA, anti-EBV antibodies and miRNA levels for early detection and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.International journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Comprehensive analysis of prognosis-related methylated sites in breast carcinoma.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Novel NBQ-48 as marker of hypoxic cells in 2D and 3D colon cancer cells.Journal of cancer prevention & current research · 2020Article
- Perspective: Cellular and Molecular Profiling Technologies in Personalized Oncology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Cancer biomarker discovery and translation: proteomics and beyond.Expert review of proteomics · 2019Article
- The Complementary Role of Imaging and Tumor Biomarkers in Gynecological Cancers: An Update of the LiteratureAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Review
- Review: in vivo optical spectral tissue sensing-how to go from research to routine clinical application?Lasers in medical science · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite significant investments in basic science by the US National Institutes of Health, there is a concern that the return on this investment has been limited in terms of clinical utility. In the field of biomarkers, translational research is used to bridge the gap between the results of basic research that identify biomolecules involved in or the consequence of carcinogenesis and their incorporation into medical application. The cultural separation between different scientific disciplines often makes it difficult to establish the multidisciplinary and multi-skilled teams that are necessary for successful translational research. The field of biomarker research requires extensive interactions between academic researchers and industrial developers, and clinicians are needed to help shape the research direction that can be addressed only by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional approach. In this article, we provide our perspective on the relatively slow pace of cancer biomarker translation, especially those for early detection and screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.