Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2012
Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening.
Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00697047 (Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Centralized Program with Stepped Support Increases Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 9 Years: a Randomized Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Trial
- Barriers and facilitators to recruitment to a culturally-based dietary intervention among urban Hispanic breast cancer survivors.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2015Trial
- Patient trust in physician influences colorectal cancer screening in low-income patients.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014Trial
- Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial.Preventive medicine · 2014Trial
- Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial.Preventive medicine · 2013Trial
- Trial
- An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2013Trial
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH).Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMTrial
- Challenges in assessing population reach in a pragmatic trial.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- Using a continuum of hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies to put research-tested colorectal screening interventions into practice.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- Time to fecal immunochemical test completion for colorectal cancer screening.The American journal of managed care · 2019Article
- Article
- Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake.ISRN oncology · 2014Review
- Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.American journal of men's health · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany trials have tested different strategies to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Few describe whether participants are representative of the population from which they are recruited. PURPOSE: To determine risk factors related to nonparticipation among patients enrolled in an integrated health plan and not up to date for CRC testing, in a trial to increase screening rates.
methodsBetween July 2008 and October 2009, a total of 15,000 adults aged 50-74 years from 21 clinics in Washington State who were due for CRC screening were contacted. Nonparticipants were defined as English-speaking patients who did not engage in the call or refused participation while still potentially eligible. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate the relative risk of nonparticipation. Analyses were completed between October 2010 and June 2011.
resultsPatients who were nonwhite, had less education, used tobacco, had less continuity of care, and had lower rates of preventive care and cancer screening were more likely to be nonparticipants. Patients reporting never having received any type of CRC testing or screening were also more likely not to participate (62% of nonparticipants vs 46% of participants; adjusted RR=1.58, 95% CI=1.47, 1.70). Reasons for refusal included costs, risks of procedures, and not wanting their medical records reviewed.
conclusionsPatients eligible for but not participating in the trial were more likely to be from minority socioeconomic and racial groups and had behaviors that can negatively affect cancer outcomes. Additional efforts are needed to recruit patients who need CRC screening the most.
trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT 00697047.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.