ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2012
Endoscopic management of nonampullary duodenal polyps.
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes].Der Internist · 2021Review
- Pathological assessment of endoscopic resections of the gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive clinicopathologic review.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Review
- Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2020Article
- Endoscopic resection or surgical management for nonampullary duodenal neoplasms?Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Article
- Molecular Aberrations in Periampullary Carcinoma.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2017Article
- A simple endoscopic scoring system to differentiate between duodenal adenoma and carcinoma.Endoscopy international open · 2017Article
- Endoscopic assessment and management of sporadic duodenal adenomas: The results of single centre multidisciplinary management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017Article
- Peutz-Jeghers syndrome with intermittent upper intestinal obstruction: A case report and review of the literature.Medicine · 2017Review
- Feasibility of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Multiple Duodenal Adenomas in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Pilot Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2016Article
- A Rare Case of Solitary Peutz Jeghers Type Hamartomatous Duodenal Polyp with Dysplasia!Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: a systematic review.Endoscopy international open · 2016Article
- Nonampullary duodenal adenoma: Current understanding of its diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Approach to the endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors, including magnifying endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Duodenal adenoma surveillance in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomatous polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Isolated duodenal adenoma presenting as gastrointestinal bleed - a case report.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014Article
- Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duodenal polyps are a rare finding in patients presenting for gastroscopy, being found in 0.3-4.6% of cases. The majority of patients are asymptomatic. The most common lesions necessitating removal are duodenal adenomas which should be differentiated from other mucosal lesions such as ectopic gastric mucosa, and submucosal lesions such as carcinoids and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Adenomas can occur sporadically or as part of a polyposis syndrome. Both groups carry malignant potential but this is higher in patients with a polyposis syndrome. The majority of sporadic duodenal adenomas are flat or sessile and occur in the second part of the duodenum. Historically duodenal adenomas have been managed by radical surgery, which carried significant mortality and morbidity, or more conservative local surgical excision which resulted in high local recurrence rates. There is growing evidence for the use of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques for treatment of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas, with good outcomes and low complication rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) carries greater risk of complications and should be reserved for experts in this technique. Patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas carry an increased risk of colonic neoplasia and should be offered colonoscopy. The impact of endoscopic resection on the course of polyposis syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) needs further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.