Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22423010›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2012

Association of established smoking among adolescents with timing of exposure to smoking depicted in movies.

Brian A Primack, Meghan R Longacre, Michael L Beach, Anna M Adachi-Mejia, Linda J Titus, Madeline A Dalton

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Waterpipe Smoking and Regulation in the United States: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A risk prediction model for smoking experimentation in Mexican American youth.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian A PrimackDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 230 McKee Place, Ste 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, USA. bprimack@pitt.edu
Meghan R Longacre
Michael L Beach
Anna M Adachi-Mejia
Linda J Titus
Madeline A Dalton

Funding

Visual Media Influences on Adolescent Smoking Behavior (YR 9 Supplement)R01CA077026 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SARGENT, JAMES D. · 1997 to 2017
$16.8M
Movie Influence on Adolesent Smoking: A Follow-up StudyR01CA108918 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI DALTON, MADELINE A. · 2005 to 2009
$2.8M
Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking among U.S. Adolescents and Young AdultsR01CA140150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIMACK, BRIAN A. · 2010 to 2015
$2.4M
Media Literacy to Prevent Adolescent Smoking InitiationK07CA114315 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIMACK, BRIAN A. · 2006 to 2010
$766k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA114315NCI NIH HHS K07-CA114315NCI NIH HHS R01-CA077026NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108918NCI NIH HHS R01-CA108918NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not known whether exposure to smoking depicted in movies carries greater influence during early or late adolescence. We aimed to quantify the independent relative contribution to established smoking of exposure to smoking depicted in movies during both early and late adolescence.

methodsWe prospectively assessed 2049 nonsmoking students recruited from 14 randomly selected public schools in New Hampshire and Vermont. At baseline enrollment, students aged 10-14 years completed a written survey to determine personal, family, and sociodemographic characteristics and exposure to depictions of smoking in the movies (early exposure). Seven years later, we conducted follow-up telephone interviews to ascertain follow-up exposure to movie smoking (late exposure) and smoking behavior. We used multiple regression models to assess associations between early and late exposure and development of established smoking.

resultsOne-sixth (17.3%) of the sample progressed to established smoking. In analyses that controlled for covariates and included early and late exposure in the same model, we found that students in the highest quartile for early exposure had 73% greater risk of established smoking than those in the lowest quartile for early exposure (27.8% vs 8.6%; relative risk for Q4 vs Q1 = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.62). However, late exposure to depictions of smoking in movies was not statistically significantly associated with established smoking (22.1% vs 14.0%; relative risk for Q4 vs Q1 = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 0.89 to 1.44). Whereas 31.6% of established smoking was attributable to early exposure, only an additional 5.3% was attributable to late exposure.

conclusionsEarly exposure to smoking depicted in movies is associated with established smoking among adolescents. Educational and policy-related interventions should focus on minimizing early exposure to smoking depicted in movies.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorImitative BehaviorMotion PicturesAdolescentAge FactorsChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMultivariate AnalysisNew HampshirePoisson DistributionSchoolsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID22423010
PMCPMC3317882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.