Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422677›Full record

ReviewHuman mutation2012

Mouse genetic and phenotypic resources for human genetics.

Paul N Schofield, Robert Hoehndorf, Georgios V Gkoutos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human mutation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neuronal Migration During Development of the Cerebellum.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  15. Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul N SchofieldDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. PS@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Robert Hoehndorf
Georgios V Gkoutos

Funding

An Ontology of Qualities for the Annotation of Biomedical DataR01HG004838 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI LEWIS, SUZANNA E · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004838NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004838-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of model organisms to provide information on gene function has proved to be a powerful approach to our understanding of both human disease and fundamental mammalian biology. Large-scale community projects using mice, based on forward and reverse genetics, and now the pan-genomic phenotyping efforts of the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, are generating resources on an unprecedented scale, which will be extremely valuable to human genetics and medicine. We discuss the nature and availability of data, mice and embryonic stem cells from these large-scale programmes, the use of these resources to help prioritize and validate candidate genes in human genetic association studies, and how they can improve our understanding of the underlying pathobiology of human disease.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalPhenotypeAnimalsDatabases, GeneticEmbryonic Stem CellsGenetic Association StudiesGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInternational CooperationMiceMice, KnockoutReverse Genetics

Identifiers

PMID22422677
PMCPMC3473354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.