Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422670›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2012

Rapid stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal nonnutritive sweetener after training with nutritive sugars predicting malaise.

Lindsey A Schier, Terry L Davidson, Terry L Powley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Post-oral sugar detection rapidly and chemospecifically modulates taste-guided behavior.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2016
    Article
  4. A view of obesity as a learning and memory disorder.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsey A SchierDept. of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Florida State Univ., 1107 W. Call St., Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. Schier@psy.fsu.edu
Terry L Davidson
Terry L Powley
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

HYPOTHALAMIC CONTROL OF BODY WEIGHT AND FEEDINGR01DK027627 · NIDDK · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI POWLEY, TERRY L. · 1986 to 2021
$6.1M
Autonomic Control of Body Weight and FeedingR37DK027627 · NIDDK · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI POWLEY, TERRY L. · 2007 to 2016
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P01-HD-05211NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK-027627NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK027627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous report (Schier et al., Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301: R1557-R1568, 2011), we demonstrated with a new behavioral procedure that rats exhibit stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal (ID) bitter tastant predicting subsequent malaise. With the use of the same modified taste aversion procedure, the present experiments evaluated whether the sweet taste properties of ID stimuli are likewise detected and encoded. Thirsty rats licked at sipper spouts for hypotonic NaCl for 30 min and received brief (first 6 min) yoked ID infusions of either the same NaCl or an isomolar lithium chloride (LiCl) solution in each session. An intestinal taste cue was mixed directly into the LiCl infusate for aversion training. Results showed that rats failed to detect intestinal sweet taste alone (20 mM Sucralose) but clearly suppressed licking in response to a nutritive sweet taste stimulus (234 mM sucrose) in the intestine that had been repeatedly paired with LiCl. Rats trained with ID sucrose in LiCl subsequently generalized responding to ID Sucralose alone at test. Replicating this, rats trained with ID Sucralose in compound with 80 mM Polycose rapidly suppressed licking to the 20 mM Sucralose alone in a later test. Furthermore, ID sweet taste signaling did not support the rapid negative feedback of sucrose or Polycose on intake when their digestion and transport were blocked. Together, these results suggest that other signaling pathways and/or transporters engaged by caloric carbohydrate stimuli potentiate detection of sweet taste signals in the intestine.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCarbohydratesFeeding BehaviorIntestinesMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySodium ChlorideStomachSucroseSweetening AgentsTasteCarbohydratesSodium ChlorideSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID22422670
PMCPMC3378344
OpenAlexW2113634968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.