Trial reportClinical orthopaedics and related research2012
Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes.
Trial report in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgery for early structural osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: the SCORE evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Autologous chondrocyte implantation, matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transplantation and osteochondral allograft improve knee function and pain with considerations for patient and cartilage defects characteristics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Applicability of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for the Treatment of Osteochondral Defects: A Meta-analysis.Current rheumatology reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic factors for the management of chondral defects of the knee and ankle joint: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Pooled it
- The Use of Autologous Chondrocyte and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implants for the Treatment of Focal Chondral Defects in Human Knee Joints-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Pooled it
- The comparison between the different generations of autologous chondrocyte implantation with other treatment modalities: a systematic review of clinical trials.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Pooled it
- Sustained superiority in KOOS subscores after matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation using spheroids compared to microfracture.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Trial
- Comparative effectiveness of osteochondral restoration, cell-based regeneration and cell-free implants for knee chondral defects: a systematic review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Replicability of Highly Cited Comparative Studies in Orthopedic Journals.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Adipose-derived regenerative therapies for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.World journal of stem cells · 2024Article
- Does progress in microfracture techniques necessarily translate into clinical effectiveness?World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a co-culture of rapidly isolated chondrocytes and stem cells seeded on tri-layered collagen-based scaffolds in a caprine osteochondral defect model.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2022Article
- Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures.Cartilage · 2021Review
- Surgical management of focal chondral defects of the knee: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Review
- Cell-free osteochondral scaffolds provide a substantial clinical benefit in the treatment of osteochondral defects at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.Cartilage · 2021Article
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Versus Microfracture of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020Review
- Microfracture Versus Drilling of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Systematic Review of the Basic Science Evidence.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany surgical techniques, including microfracture, periosteal and perichondral grafts, chondrocyte transplantation, and osteochondral grafts, have been studied in an attempt to restore damaged articular cartilage. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to repair isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared postoperative functional outcomes, followup MRI appearance, and arthroscopic examination after microfracture (MF), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI).
methodsWe prospectively investigated 30 knees with MF, 22 with OAT, and 18 with ACI. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 5 years; range, 3-10 years). We included only patients with isolated cartilage defects and without other knee injuries. The three procedures were compared in terms of function using the Lysholm knee evaluation scale, Tegner activity scale, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score; modified Outerbridge cartilage grades using MRI; and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) repair grade using arthroscopy.
resultsAll three procedures showed improvement in functional scores. There were no differences in functional scores and postoperative MRI grades among the groups. Arthroscopy at 1 year showed excellent or good results in 80% after MF, 82% after OAT, and 80% after ACI. Our study did not show a clear benefit of either ACI or OAT over MF.
conclusionsOwing to a lack of superiority of any one treatment, we believe MF is a reasonable option as a first-line therapy given its ease and affordability relative to ACI or OAT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.