Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422475›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in cell biology2012

Analysis of polarized membrane traffic in hepatocytes and hepatic cell lines.

Julie G In, Gudrun Ihrke, Pamela L Tuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hepatocyte polarity.Comprehensive Physiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie G InDepartment of Biology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA.
Gudrun Ihrke
Pamela L Tuma
Catholic University of America · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of America · US

Funding

Alcohol-induced changes in protein acetylation: mechanisms and consequencesR01AA017626 · NIAAA · CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA · PI PAMELA L. TUMA · 2010 to 2026
$3.0M
MAL2 regulation of hepatic protein trafficking: mechanisms and binding partnersR01DK082890 · NIDDK · CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA · PI TUMA, PAMELA L. · 2009 to 2012
$774k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017626NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protocols described in this unit were developed to monitor membrane traffic in cultured cell monolayers that display hepatic polarity. In general, the assays are designed to visualize and/or quantitate membrane trafficking by monitoring the fates of antibodies bound to specific membrane proteins. We first describe how to infect cells with recombinant adenovirus, the preferred method for introducing exogenous genes into hepatic cells. We next provide a morphological assay to monitor basolateral to apical transcytosis. In a supporting protocol, we describe how to visualize apical recycling and/or retention. In an additional supporting protocol, we provide a semi-quantitative method to measure the relative extents of apical delivery. Finally, we describe quantitative assays to measure basolateral internalization and recycling. The methods presented in this unit provide a relatively simple, yet powerful approach to examining hepatic membrane traffic.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAnimalsCell LineCell MembraneCytological TechniquesHepatocytesHumansProteinsProtein TransportStaining and LabelingTranscytosisProteins

Identifiers

PMID22422475
PMCPMC4390120
OpenAlexW1778418746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.