Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422405›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

Bridging the gap: moving predictive and prognostic assays from research to clinical use.

P Michael Williams, Tracy G Lively, J Milburn Jessup, Barbara A Conley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barrett's oesophagus: Current controversies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Predictive biomarkers for Barrett's esophagus: so near and yet so far.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2013
    Review
  16. From targets to targeted therapies and molecular profiling in non-small cell lung carcinoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Leveling the playing field: bringing development of biomarkers and molecular diagnostics up to the standards for drug development.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  19. Lessons learned from the investigational device exemption review of Children's Oncology Group trial AAML1031.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  20. Development and use of integral assays in clinical trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P Michael WilliamsFairview Center, Frederick, MD, USA.
Tracy G Lively
J Milburn Jessup
Barbara A Conley

Funding

Embryonic Transcription Factor Function in Human Colorectal Cancer Stem CellsZIABC011199 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI JESSUP, JOHN · 2009 to 2014
$718k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of clinically useful molecular diagnostics requires validation of clinical assay performance and achievement of clinical qualification in clinical trials. As discussed elsewhere in this Focus section on molecular diagnostics, validation of assay performance must be rigorous, especially when the assay will be used to guide treatment decisions. Here we review some of the problems associated with assay development, especially for academic investigators. These include lack of expertise and resources for analytical validation, lack of experience in designing projects for a specific clinical use, lack of specimens from appropriate patient groups, and lack of access to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratories. In addition, financial support for assay validation has lagged behind financial support for marker discovery or drug development, even though the molecular diagnostic may be considered necessary for the successful use of the companion therapeutic. The National Cancer Institute supports a large number of clinical trials and a significant effort in drug development. In order to address some of these barriers for predictive and prognostic assays that will be used in clinical trials to select patients for a particular treatment, stratify patients into molecularly defined subgroups, or choose between treatments for molecularly defined tumors, the National Cancer Institute has begun a pilot program designed to lessen barriers to the development of validated prognostic and predictive assays.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)NeoplasmsPathology, MolecularPilot ProjectsPrognosisUnited StatesValidation Studies as TopicBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22422405
PMCPMC3307151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.