Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422404›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

Impact of preanalytic factors on the design and application of integral biomarkers for directing patient therapy.

Stephen M Hewitt, Sunil S Badve, Lawrence D True

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Histomorphological and Molecular Assessments of the Fixation Times Comparing Formalin and Ethanol-Based Fixatives.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A Buffered Alcohol-Based Fixative for Histomorphologic and Molecular Applications.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular oncology testing in resource-limited settings.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2014
    Review
  10. Improving the state of the science of immunohistochemistry: the Histochemical Society's standards of practice.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2014
    Article
  11. Profiling of phospho-AKT, phospho-mTOR, phospho-MAPK and EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Leveling the playing field: bringing development of biomarkers and molecular diagnostics up to the standards for drug development.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  15. Development and use of integral assays in clinical trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen M HewittNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. hewitts@mail.nih.gov
Sunil S Badve
Lawrence D True

Funding

Tissue Array Research ProgramZICBC010923 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HEWITT, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2014
$4.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular assays have been routinely applied to improve diagnosis for the last 25 years. Assays that guide therapy have a similar history; however, their evolution has lacked the focus on analytic integrity that is required for the molecularly targeted therapies of today. New molecularly targeted agents require assays of greater precision/quantitation to predict the likelihood of response, i.e., to identify patients whose tumors will respond, while at the same time excluding and protecting those patients whose tumors will not respond or in whom treatment will cause unacceptable toxicity. The handling of tissue has followed a fit-for-purpose approach focused on appropriateness for diagnostic needs, which is less rigorous than the demands of new molecular assays that interrogate DNA, RNA, and proteins in a quantitative, multiplex manner. There is a new appreciation of the importance and fragility of tissue specimens as the source of analytes to direct therapy. By applying a total test paradigm and defining and measuring sources of variability in specimens, we can develop a set of specifications that can be incorporated into the clinical-care environment to ensure that a specimen is appropriate for analysis and will return a true result.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyBiomarkers, TumorBody FluidsDNAHumansNeoplasmsProteinsResearch DesignRNASpecimen HandlingValidation Studies as TopicBiomarkers, TumorDNAProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID22422404
PMCPMC3307804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.