ArticlePharmaceutical research2012
A non-invasive, low-cost study design to determine the release profile of colon drug delivery systems: a feasibility study.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Formulation of a 3D Printed Biopharmaceutical: The Development of an Alkaline Phosphatase Containing Tablet with Ileo-Colonic Release Profile to Treat Ulcerative Colitis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Towards the Oral Treatment of Ileo-Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Infliximab Tablets: Development and Validation of the Production Process.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConventional bioavailability testing of dosage forms based on plasma concentration-time graphs of two products in a two-period, crossover-design, is not applicable to topical treatment of intestinal segments. We introduce an isotope dual-label approach ((13)C- and (15)N(2)-urea) for colon drug delivery systems that can be performed in a one-day, non-invasive study-design.
methodsFour healthy volunteers took an uncoated or a ColoPulse-capsule containing (13)C-urea and an uncoated capsule containing (15)N(2)-urea. In case of colon-release (13)C-urea is fermented and (13)C detected as breath (13)CO(2). Absorbed (13)C-urea and (15)N-urea are detected in urine.
resultsC and (15)N in urine released from uncoated capsules showed a ratio of 1.01 ± 0.06. The (13)C/(15)N-recovery ratio after intake of a ColoPulse-capsule was constant and lower >12 h post-dose (median 0.22, range 0.13-0.48). The (13)C/(15)N-ratio in a single urine sample at t ≥ 12 h predicted the 24 h non-fermented fraction (13)C of <26 %. Breath (13)CO(2) indicated delayed (>3 h) release and a fermented fraction (13)C >54 %.
conclusionsBreath and urine (13)C and (15)N data describe the release-profile and local bioavailability of a colon delivery device. This allows non-invasive bioavailability studies for evaluation of colon-specific drug delivery systems without radioactive exposure and with increased power and strongly reduced costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22422322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.