Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422301›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2012

Systematic analysis of genotype-specific drug responses in cancer.

Nayoung Kim, Ningning He, Changsik Kim, Fan Zhang, Yiling Lu, Qinghua Yu, Katherine Stemke-Hale, Joel Greshock, Richard Wooster, Sukjoon Yoon and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeting IL11 Receptor in Leukemia and Lymphoma: A Functional Ligand-Directed Study and Hematopathology Analysis of Patient-Derived Specimens.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cell line modeling for systems medicine in cancers (review).International journal of oncology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nayoung KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ningning He
Changsik Kim
Fan Zhang
Yiling Lu
Qinghua Yu
Katherine Stemke-Hale
Joel Greshock
Richard Wooster
Sukjoon Yoon
Gordon B Mills
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSookmyung Women's University · KRGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USIn-Q-Tel · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Systems-Based Predictions of Responses to Cancer TherapyU54CA112970 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2004 to 2014
$27.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA16672-34NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112970NCI NIH HHS U54CA112970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic understanding of genotype-specific sensitivity or resistance to anticancer agents is required to provide improved patient therapy. The availability of an expansive panel of annotated cancer cell lines enables comparative surveys of associations between genotypes and compounds of various target classes. Thus, one can better predict the optimal treatment for a specific tumor. Here, we present a statistical framework, cell line enrichment analysis (CLEA), to associate the response of anticancer agents with major cancer genotypes. Multilevel omics data, including transcriptome, proteome and phosphatome data, were integrated with drug data based on the genotypic classification of cancer cell lines. The results reproduced known patterns of compound sensitivity associated with particular genotypes. In addition, this approach reveals multiple unexpected associations between compounds and mutational genotypes. The mutational genotypes led to unique protein activation and gene expression signatures, which provided a mechanistic understanding of their functional effects. Furthermore, CLEA maps revealed interconnections between TP53 mutations and other mutations in the context of drug responses. The TP53 mutational status appears to play a dominant role in determining clustering patterns of gene and protein expression profiles for major cancer genotypes. This study provides a framework for the integrative analysis of mutations, drug responses and omics data in cancers.

Indexed as

GenotypeAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCluster AnalysisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsHumansMutationNeoplasmsProteomeProteomicsAntineoplastic AgentsProteomeTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID22422301
PMCPMC4012336
OpenAlexW2049367604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.