ReviewEcotoxicology (London, England)2012
Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?
Review in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Alginate-Based Silver Nanoparticle Films on Young Arugula Plants (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dietary cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) mitigates benzo[a]pyrene-induced oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, and tissue damage in Nile tilapia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Freshwater CiliateJournal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Rebuttal to Correspondence on "Are Biobased Microfibers Less Harmful than Conventional Plastic Microfibers: Evidence from Earthworms".Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Are Biobased Microfibers Less Harmful than Conventional Plastic Microfibers: Evidence from Earthworms.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Sediment Toxicity Tests: A Critical Review of Their use in Environmental Regulations.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2024Review
- Review
- Determination of metallic nanoparticles in biological samples by single particle ICP-MS: a systematic review from sample collection to analysis.Environmental science. Nano · 2022Review
- Drosophila as a Suitable In Vivo Model in the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Dependence of Graphene Oxide (GO) Toxicity on Oxidation Level, Elemental Composition, and Size.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Nanoparticles: Weighing the Pros and Cons from an Eco-genotoxicological Perspective.Journal of cancer prevention · 2021Review
- New guidance brings clarity to environmental hazard and behaviour testing of nanomaterials.Nature nanotechnology · 2021Article
- Toxicity of Nanoparticulate Nickel to Aquatic Organisms: Review and Recommendations for Improvement of Toxicity Tests.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2020Review
- Toward the Development and Application of an Environmental Risk Assessment Framework for Microplastic.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2019Review
- Use of Cyanobacterial Luminescent Bioreporters to Report on the Environmental Impact of Metallic Nanoparticles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A novel method for assessing microplastic effect in suspension through mixing test and reference materials.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Toxicity of nanoparticles_ challenges and opportunities.Applied microscopy · 2019Review
- Strategies for robust and accurate experimental approaches to quantify nanomaterial bioaccumulation across a broad range of organisms.Environmental science. Nano · 2019Article
- Toxicology of Engineered Nanoparticles: Focus on Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
- Alginic Acid-Aided Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Boron Nitride Nanomaterials for Microbial Toxicity Testing.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review paper reports the consensus of a technical workshop hosted by the European network, NanoImpactNet (NIN). The workshop aimed to review the collective experience of working at the bench with manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs), and to recommend modifications to existing experimental methods and OECD protocols. Current procedures for cleaning glassware are appropriate for most MNMs, although interference with electrodes may occur. Maintaining exposure is more difficult with MNMs compared to conventional chemicals. A metal salt control is recommended for experiments with metallic MNMs that may release free metal ions. Dispersing agents should be avoided, but if they must be used, then natural or synthetic dispersing agents are possible, and dispersion controls essential. Time constraints and technology gaps indicate that full characterisation of test media during ecotoxicity tests is currently not practical. Details of electron microscopy, dark-field microscopy, a range of spectroscopic methods (EDX, XRD, XANES, EXAFS), light scattering techniques (DLS, SLS) and chromatography are discussed. The development of user-friendly software to predict particle behaviour in test media according to DLVO theory is in progress, and simple optical methods are available to estimate the settling behaviour of suspensions during experiments. However, for soil matrices such simple approaches may not be applicable. Alternatively, a Critical Body Residue approach may be taken in which body concentrations in organisms are related to effects, and toxicity thresholds derived. For microbial assays, the cell wall is a formidable barrier to MNMs and end points that rely on the test substance penetrating the cell may be insensitive. Instead assays based on the cell envelope should be developed for MNMs. In algal growth tests, the abiotic factors that promote particle aggregation in the media (e.g. ionic strength) are also important in providing nutrients, and manipulation of the media to control the dispersion may also inhibit growth. Controls to quantify shading effects, and precise details of lighting regimes, shaking or mixing should be reported in algal tests. Photosynthesis may be more sensitive than traditional growth end points for algae and plants. Tests with invertebrates should consider non-chemical toxicity from particle adherence to the organisms. The use of semi-static exposure methods with fish can reduce the logistical issues of waste water disposal and facilitate aspects of animal husbandry relevant to MMNs. There are concerns that the existing bioaccumulation tests are conceptually flawed for MNMs and that new test(s) are required. In vitro testing strategies, as exemplified by genotoxicity assays, can be modified for MNMs, but the risk of false negatives in some assays is highlighted. In conclusion, most protocols will require some modifications and recommendations are made to aid the researcher at the bench.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.