Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22422174›Full record

ReviewEcotoxicology (London, England)2012

Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Richard D Handy, Nico van den Brink, Mark Chappell, Martin Mühling, Renata Behra, Maria Dušinská, Peter Simpson, Jukka Ahtiainen, Awadhesh N Jha, Jennifer Seiter and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Freshwater CiliateJournal of xenobiotics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Toxicology of Engineered Nanoparticles: Focus on Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Richard D HandyEcotoxicology Research and Innovation Centre, School of Biomedical & Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. rhandy@plymouth.ac.uk
Nico van den Brink
Mark Chappell
Martin Mühling
Renata Behra
Maria Dušinská
Peter Simpson
Jukka Ahtiainen
Awadhesh N Jha
Jennifer Seiter
Anthony Bednar
Alan Kennedy
Teresa F Fernandes
Michael Riediker
United States Army · USUniversity of Plymouth · GBU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center · USEnvironment Agency · GBFinnish Safety and Chemicals Agency · FIHeriot-Watt University · GBInstitute for Work and Health · CHSlovak Medical University · SKSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CHTU Bergakademie Freiberg · DEWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review paper reports the consensus of a technical workshop hosted by the European network, NanoImpactNet (NIN). The workshop aimed to review the collective experience of working at the bench with manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs), and to recommend modifications to existing experimental methods and OECD protocols. Current procedures for cleaning glassware are appropriate for most MNMs, although interference with electrodes may occur. Maintaining exposure is more difficult with MNMs compared to conventional chemicals. A metal salt control is recommended for experiments with metallic MNMs that may release free metal ions. Dispersing agents should be avoided, but if they must be used, then natural or synthetic dispersing agents are possible, and dispersion controls essential. Time constraints and technology gaps indicate that full characterisation of test media during ecotoxicity tests is currently not practical. Details of electron microscopy, dark-field microscopy, a range of spectroscopic methods (EDX, XRD, XANES, EXAFS), light scattering techniques (DLS, SLS) and chromatography are discussed. The development of user-friendly software to predict particle behaviour in test media according to DLVO theory is in progress, and simple optical methods are available to estimate the settling behaviour of suspensions during experiments. However, for soil matrices such simple approaches may not be applicable. Alternatively, a Critical Body Residue approach may be taken in which body concentrations in organisms are related to effects, and toxicity thresholds derived. For microbial assays, the cell wall is a formidable barrier to MNMs and end points that rely on the test substance penetrating the cell may be insensitive. Instead assays based on the cell envelope should be developed for MNMs. In algal growth tests, the abiotic factors that promote particle aggregation in the media (e.g. ionic strength) are also important in providing nutrients, and manipulation of the media to control the dispersion may also inhibit growth. Controls to quantify shading effects, and precise details of lighting regimes, shaking or mixing should be reported in algal tests. Photosynthesis may be more sensitive than traditional growth end points for algae and plants. Tests with invertebrates should consider non-chemical toxicity from particle adherence to the organisms. The use of semi-static exposure methods with fish can reduce the logistical issues of waste water disposal and facilitate aspects of animal husbandry relevant to MMNs. There are concerns that the existing bioaccumulation tests are conceptually flawed for MNMs and that new test(s) are required. In vitro testing strategies, as exemplified by genotoxicity assays, can be modified for MNMs, but the risk of false negatives in some assays is highlighted. In conclusion, most protocols will require some modifications and recommendations are made to aid the researcher at the bench.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayComet AssayEcotoxicologyEndpoint DeterminationFishesGuidelines as TopicMetalsMicronucleus TestsMicroscopy, ElectronNanostructuresParticle SizeSoil MicrobiologyToxicity TestsMetals

Identifiers

PMID22422174
PMCPMC3325413
OpenAlexW2033285594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.