Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22421738›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Investigating the benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Myra F Barginear, Richard J Gralla, Thomas P Bradley, Syed S Ali, Iuliana Shapira, Craig Greben, Nanette Nier-Shoulson, Meredith Akerman, Martin Lesser, Daniel R Budman

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A review of inferior vena cava filters.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Inferior vena cava filters: a framework for evidence-based use.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Inferior vena cava filters: current best practices.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Myra F BarginearHofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Monter Cancer Center, Lake Success, NY, USA. MBarginear@nshs.edu
Richard J Gralla
Thomas P Bradley
Syed S Ali
Iuliana Shapira
Craig Greben
Nanette Nier-Shoulson
Meredith Akerman
Martin Lesser
Daniel R Budman
Hofstra University · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation in treating cancer patients with venous thromboembolism remains controversial. We initiated this study as the first prospectively randomized trial to evaluate the addition of a vena cava filter placement to anticoagulation with the factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer.

methodsSixty-four patients with deep vein thrombosis (86 %) and/or pulmonary embolism (55 %) were randomly assigned to receive anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium with or without a vena cava filter. Endpoints included rates of complications by treatment arm, recurrent thromboembolism, complete resolution of thromboembolism, and survival rates.

resultsNo patient had a recurrent deep vein thrombosis; two (3 %) patients had new pulmonary emboli, one in each randomized cohort. Major bleeding occurred in three patients (5 %). Two patients on the vena cava filter arm (7 %) had complications from the filter. Median survivals were 493 days in the anticoagulation only arm and 266 days for anticoagulation + vena cava filter (p < 0.57). Complete resolution of venous thromboembolism occurred in 51 % of patients within 8 weeks of initiating anticoagulation.

conclusionsNo advantage was found for placement of a vena cava filter in addition to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in terms of safety, recurrent thrombosis, recurrent pulmonary embolism, or survival in this prospective randomized trial evaluating anticoagulation plus a vena cava filter in cancer patients. Favorable complete resolution rates of thrombosis were observed on both study arms.

Indexed as

Vena Cava FiltersAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsCombined Modality TherapyFondaparinuxHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPolysaccharidesProspective StudiesRecurrenceSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsFondaparinuxPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID22421738
OpenAlexW2079574351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.