Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22421511›Full record

ReviewExperimental cell research2012

Apicobasal polarity in the kidney.

Marc A Schlüter, Ben Margolis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental cell research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Membrane Lipids in Epithelial Polarity: Sorting out the PIPs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Disease Modeling To Understand the Pathomechanisms of Human Genetic Kidney Disorders.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Partitioning-Defective 1a/b Depletion Impairs Glomerular and Proximal Tubule Development.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc A SchlüterDepartment of Internal Medicine D, University Hospital of Münster, Germany.
Ben Margolis

Funding

Crumbs3 in epithelial polarity and ciliogenesisR01DK069605 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARGOLIS, BENJAMIN L · 2005 to 2013
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK69605NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The apicobasal polarization of epithelia is critical for many aspects of kidney function. Over the last decade there have been major advances in our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this polarity. Critical to this understanding has been the identification of protein complexes on the apical and basolateral sides of epithelial cells that act in a mutually antagonistic manner to define these domains. Concomitant with the creation of apical and basolateral domains is the formation of highly specialized cell-cell junctions including adherens junctions and tight junctions. Recent research points to variability in the polarity and junctional complexes amongst different species and between different cell types of the kidney. Defects in apicobasal polarity are prominent in several disorders including acute renal failure and polycystic kidney disease.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAcute Kidney InjuryAdherens JunctionsAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansIntercellular JunctionsKidneyPolycystic Kidney Diseases

Identifiers

PMID22421511
PMCPMC3334475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.