Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22421191›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

Phase I trial of intraperitoneal pemetrexed, cisplatin, and paclitaxel in optimally debulked ovarian cancer.

Setsuko K Chambers, H-H Sherry Chow, Mike F Janicek, Janiel M Cragun, Kenneth D Hatch, Haiyan Cui, Cynthia Laughren, Mary C Clouser, Janice L Cohen, Heather M Wright and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pre-clinical evaluation of a themosensitive gel containing epothilone B and mTOR/Hsp90 targeted agents in an ovarian tumor model.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer by hydrogel depot of paclitaxel nanocrystals.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nanocrystals for the parenteral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Setsuko K ChambersUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA. schambers@azcc.arizona.edu
H-H Sherry Chow
Mike F Janicek
Janiel M Cragun
Kenneth D Hatch
Haiyan Cui
Cynthia Laughren
Mary C Clouser
Janice L Cohen
Heather M Wright
Nisreen Abu Shahin
David S Alberts
University of Arizona Cancer CenterUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Justin M Snider · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA-023074NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis phase I trial evaluated intraperitoneal (i.p.) pemetrexed, cisplatin, and paclitaxel in optimally debulked ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

designDose escalation of day 1 i.p. pemetrexed accrued three patients to each of five dose levels (60-1,000 mg/m(2)), along with day 2 i.p. cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) and day 8 i.p. paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)). The goals were to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and pharmacokinetics of i.p. pemetrexed.

resultsCycles, given every 21 days, had an 80% 6-cycle completion rate. There was minimal grade III toxicity in the first 4 dose levels and remarkably an almost complete absence of peripheral neuropathy and alopecia. At the highest dose level, two of three patients experienced ≥ grade III and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; hematologic, infection, gastrointestinal). There was a pharmacokinetic advantage for i.p. pemetrexed with an intraperitoneal:plasma area under the concentration-time curve ratio of 13-fold. Neither analysis of pharmacokinetic nor homocysteine levels explains the unexpected severity of toxicity in those two patients. On the basis of plasma C(24h) levels, the 42 cycles at ≥ 500 mg/m(2) i.p. pemetrexed without DLT, the MTD appears to be 500 mg/m(2). Median PFS is 30.1 months; 18-month PFS is 78.6% (median follow-up 22.4 months).

conclusionsThis i.p.-only regimen in front-line ovarian cancer is feasible with PFS in line with recent literature. We suggest phase II trials of this regimen in this population with i.p. pemetrexed at 500 mg/m(2). The favorable toxicity profile at doses <1,000 mg/m(2), which needs to be confirmed, appears to compare well with standard combination i.v./i.p. platinum/taxane chemotherapy in this disease.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlutamatesGuanineHumansInjections, IntraperitonealMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelCisplatinGlutamatesGuaninePaclitaxelPemetrexed

Identifiers

PMID22421191
PMCPMC3343173
OpenAlexW2025223979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.